User talk:Falcon866

Please stop. If you continue to blank out (or delete portions of) page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Sockatume 17:04, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is Falcon866's talk page.

My archives: 1.

All archived! You can see WP:ARCHIVE for instructions. Feel free to ask me again if you need help. Cheers! Yuser31415 22:12, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In fact, from my Wikipedia notes,

How to make an archive ($PAGENAME=is the name of the page to archive, and $NUM is the archive number):

Move '$PAGENAME' to '$PAGENAME/Archive $NUM'.
Add a link in '$PAGENAME' to the newly created archive, ie. 'Archives: [[$PAGENAME/Archive $NUM|$NUM]]'.

Hope that's simpler; but then, I'm a programmer, so it might seem hard to you .... let me know if so. Cheers! Yuser31415 22:23, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sandbox header

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. You may make test edits in the sandbox, but for the convenience of others, please leave the sandbox heading alone. —Keakealani·?·!·@ 04:35, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Apple Inc. move to Apple Incorporated

Please do not perform possibly controversial moves without discussing it on the talke page first. Apple Computer was already moved today to Apple Inc. because of the name change, and Apple advertised the new name as "Apple Inc." so that is where the page was moved to. -- Renesis (talk) 00:41, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An Automated Message from HagermanBot

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 02:02, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

March 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Alex Rodriguez, you will be blocked from editing. Bmg916 ^{Speak to Me} 22:12, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding edits made during March 28 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Xbox 360 Elite, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Natl1 (Talk Page) (Contribs) 20:12, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Falcon866 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I should not at least be blocked idefinetnt. The block was too harsh. I am positive contributor to wiki. At least dont block me for ever

Decline reason:

See WJBscribe's "response" below. Also, I see a history of off-and-on vandalism, including previous pagemove vandalism. If this account is compromised, it should be blocked. If this user is interspersing good edits with vandalism in order to game the system, it should be blocked. -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 17:21, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Response

Yes, I see that. I want an explanation - page moves requiring administrators to fix are serious vandalism. Why did you do it? I also suggest an apology and undertaking not to do it again. WjBscribe 17:14, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Before you unblock, please take a look at his move log. The page move vandalism goes back several months. ChazBeckett 17:18, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I see that too. I still want an explanation but it had better be good. I'm not minded to unblock at present and advise other admins review the unblock request against it. WjBscribe 17:19, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I dont know why i did it.--Falcon866 17:29, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not good enough. You did it today and you did it on the 10 March. I agree your other contributions are positive but it takes quite a bit of time to fix multiple page moves to two high profile pages. At the moment it seems better for us to lose your positive contributions than to have to fix your occasional vandal sprees. WjBscribe 17:32, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I will stop i promise--Falcon866 17:36, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry - the move log says it all. That's just blatant vandalism and you've been warned about it before. Pagemoves are particularly bad as they generally require serious intervention to put to rights while preserving the edit history. You have done good edits in the past but you've also repeatedly gone on the rampage, too. - Alison^☺ 17:46, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Bb2k8-145x200.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bb2k8-145x200.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:18, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File:Silverps2.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Silverps2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 00:05, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]