User talk:Fakecatchers

Hello, Fakecatchers, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! Ahunt (talk) 13:07, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

Getting started

• Introduction
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Intuitive guide to Wikipedia

Finding your way around

• Table of contents
• Directories and indexes
• Department directory

Editing articles

• How to develop an article
• Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help

• Frequently asked questions
• Cheatsheet
• Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
• The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
• Help pages
• Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles

How you can help

• Community Portal
• Join a WikiProject
• Follow Wikipedia etiquette
• Practice civility
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

July 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sukhoi Su-30MKK. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. All changes have to be referenced using reliable sources. BilletsMauves (talk) 11:59, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

December 2022

Hello, I'm McSly. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Sukhoi Su-35‎, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. McSly (talk) 13:11, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

Dear McSly. I noticed that you have removed my edits with no proper citations. I simply said theat the aircraft "may" have crashed due to given reasons. I have given two sources and I think if you would please stop removing my citations that would be great. Listen we have brains. A user told me that the source says "downed" however there is no evidence. When we say something we prove it. We don't prove that something is not there. I hope you understand. Thanks Fakecatchers (talk) 04:03, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

And please don't use edit summaries to insult other users. Drmies (talk) 23:20, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Sukhoi Su-35‎. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. -Fnlayson (talk) 01:01, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

Dear Fnlayson, I would like you to point out my mistake, I don't want to be in a conflict, I have sources and I cited them, simply open the links given and read them and then interpret them. Only when you do that you will see I have not introduced misinformations of any bad thing.

Thanks. Fakecatchers (talk) 04:08, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

Your edit

This was your edit, reverted by User:BilletsMauves, User:Fnlayson, User:Nigel Ish, and User:BilCat: "Having said that, the jet may have crashed due to the unexploded missiles on the aircraft's wings and the preservation of the airframe."[1][2]

You keep complaining the reverts were unexplained but that's incorrect--"OR" is cited in the first revert, "original research". Another revert said "ext not supported by cited sources", which is correct: the two references (which are identical) do NOT say that the plane "may have crashed due to the unexploded missiles", whatever that means: that's original research. In addition, "Having said that" is a poor transition, your comment should have been placed AFTER the reference that was already there, and you have reverted FOUR times, meaning I could block you right now for edit warring. Finally, you have not given any good reasons for your reverts, you have failed to seek out the talk page even though you were prompted to do so, and the tone of some of your summaries is just totally uncollegial. And that you revert twice more after I warned you, that's just silly. I hope this is over now. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 05:01, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

Have you read what the sources say? Here it is again,they literally said the jet was intact, do you think a missile at mach 2 would hit a jet and the fighter would come down intact ? Let us see, the two sources say,"The Russian Aerospace Forces aircraft crashed in the country’s eastern Kharkiv region, reportedly near the town of Izium. It has not been revealed why it crashed, though it appears it came down intact and caught fire." How could you say my claims are incorrect but when you think logically it actually is ? It has been claimed that my edits were "incoherent", then I will ask you a simple question , if I were to beautifully phrase my sentences will you object ? They allege that it was " unsourced and incoherent OR". Tell me how is it unsourced when it the links are in front of them. To add more, you have claimed that I insult people which may be correct if you referred to "what the hell is wrong with you". But have you noticed your own words and treatment. Saying "silly" is not an insult? I reverted simply because I saw no need to undo my edits. When someone talks to me like you are I would have no problem to argue. On the other hand you probably are oblivious to the fact that I am a new user and I don't really have much experience. Last but not least, I don't even know where the talk page of the Su-35 is. So instead of insulting people and make them look uncollegial I would suggest that if you had any problems point them out in a good manner because I have meant to hurt anyone's feelings unlike you did now.

I hope we can have a polite understanding and a calm agreement. Thanks in advance. Fakecatchers (talk) 07:15, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

Hello Mr. Drmies. I wanted to stress something, I don't use insults and terrible language in public, let alone such formal websites and even if I do I regret it and apologize publicly like I insulted publicly . There has been a good example on youtube where the account googleplex I said to a person he is a clown, of course I apologized immediately, I can right away give you the email and password because I don't really need that account anymore. You can check it afterwards. You will probably say that is personal information but I trust the users of this website so I am responsible.

If you need the account email and password tell me, I am ready.

Sincerely. Fakecatchers (talk) 07:25, 13 December 2022 (UTC)