Jump to content

User talk:FakeVerify

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Editing on S.U.C.C.E.S.S.

[edit]

Do not intimidate or threaten other users, doing so is unacceptable, see WP:BULLY and WP:HA, you do not own pages. Please also do not add commentary like material to articles like you have here: (*Content and cited articles in question, requesting admin verification, vandalism and physical assaults has taken place in actual agency area due to unverified misinformation, agency has been made aware of this wiki page | user in question: Amigao). If you would like to talk to an administrator, you can contact a recently active administrator by placing a message on their talk page or place {{Admin help}} on your talk page in wikitext. Thanks. Dylsss (talk) 18:27, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FakeVerify, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi FakeVerify! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Nick Moyes (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 20 September 2020 (UTC)


September 2020

[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Dylsss (talk) 18:23, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon Your recent edits to S.U.C.C.E.S.S. could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 18:34, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 18:21, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]