User talk:Fajita1
June 2008
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Ralow Brown, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Ralow Brown was changed by Fajita1 (u) (t) redirecting article to non-existant page on 2008-06-27T19:37:02+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 19:37, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to The Bill, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Schumi555 (talk) 20:15, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
July 2008
[edit] Thanks for experimenting with the page The Bill on Wikipedia. Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information, and has been reverted or removed. All information in the encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable published source. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Please do not insert deliberate factual errors, these really do not help anyone as it is possible that someone who knows nothing about The Bill would be looking at the page and take your edits as correct. Police,Mad,Jack (talk · contribs)☺ 19:47, 5 July 2008 (UTC) Police,Mad,Jack (talk · contribs)☺ 19:47, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to The Bill. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. As per last warning, due to you doing it once again. I was forced to give you another warning. Police,Mad,Jack (talk · contribs)☺ 19:48, 5 July 2008 (UTC) Police,Mad,Jack (talk · contribs)☺ 19:48, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
Please do not intentionally introduce incorrect information to pages, as you did with this edit to The Bill. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. bodnotbod (talk) 19:52, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to The Bill, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. As per other warnings. Police,Mad,Jack (talk · contribs)☺ 20:02, 5 July 2008 (UTC) Police,Mad,Jack (talk · contribs)☺ 20:02, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did to The Bill, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. As per other warnings. Police,Mad,Jack (talk · contribs)☺ 20:02, 5 July 2008 (UTC) Police,Mad,Jack (talk · contribs)☺ 20:02, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
31 hour block. Please, once the block expires, do not add content of a "tba" nature unless you can provide reliable sources for the information. LessHeard vanU (talk) 21:59, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
I would type "Enjoy your block" out of pure politeness, but I'm not all that polite. But anyway enjoy, but dont enjoy if you get what I mean, but do enjoy-ish. Police,Mad,Jack (talk · contribs)☺ 22:02, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Rilo Brown
[edit]
A tag has been placed on Rilo Brown, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Police,Mad,Jack (talk · contribs)☺ 21:38, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Alison McAtee
[edit]
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Alison McAtee, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Police,Mad,Jack (talk · contribs)☺ 21:40, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Alison McAtee
[edit]A tag has been placed on Alison McAtee, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Police,Mad,Jack (talk · contribs)☺ 21:56, 5 July 2008 (UTC)