User talk:Fafhrdrn1154

Welcome

Hello, Fafhrdrn1154! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! Falcon8765 (talk) 19:44, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Young King OURs

I've redirested your page to Young King OURs as both the articles are on the same subject--Notedgrant (talk) 14:32, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If your article satisfies WP's criteria you can undo my edit here Young King and WP:BOLD--Notedgrant (talk) 14:44, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Northwest Passage (newspaper)

The article Northwest Passage (newspaper) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of how this might meet notability guidelines. Lacks citations to significant coverage in reliable sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RadioFan (talk) 00:39, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Cage of Eden

I have nominated Cage of Eden, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cage of Eden. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. —Farix (t | c) 12:09, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Correction to Quicksilver Times page

Greetings,

Data point: the editor named was Paul Terence Becker. He could correctly be called Paul Becker Jr., as his father's first name was Paul, but Terry went by Terry and is probably best -- and most accurately -- styled as Terry Becker. Feel free to query me if you have additional questions.

All best, Easternpika (talk) 15:17, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of Underground Press Syndicate members

The article List of Underground Press Syndicate members has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:ISNOT and WP:STAND.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ttonyb (talk) 19:58, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Underground Press Syndicate members for deletion

The article List of Underground Press Syndicate members is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Underground Press Syndicate members until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ttonyb (talk) 00:21, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Fafhrdrn1154 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

71.167.250.32 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Abusing multiple accounts: TRATTOOO

Blocking administrator: Cirt (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: Thank you for reporting this sockpuppet acount. I would be happy to correct the problem by blocking it directly. If you have any other unblocked accounts, you don't need to request their blocking- just refrain from using them. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 00:08, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Fafhrdrn1154 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not Trattooo, if by "multiple accounts" FisherQueen means that Trattooo appears to have posted in the past from some of the same (or similar) IP addresses as some I have used. Trattooo to appears to be a local individual here in New York City who may have abused Wikipedia accounts while logging in through some more or less public IP addresses which I sometimes use as well (the New York Public Library, where I am posting from now, and a cybercafe-type place nearby where "Trattooo" has caused a Wikipedia block of all the rentable machines). The specific IP address I asked to have unblocked uses dynamic IP addressing from Verizon, and evidently (this is a presumption on my part) must overlap some dynamic IP address used by Trattooo in the past.

Trattooo appears to be a freelance writer and self-proclaimed ethicist (!) who lives here in New York City and logs in to Wikipedia and other places to post quotations from his own works, perhaps in an effort at self-promotion. I don't have any desire to be involved in this person's battles with Wikipedia admins in any way, and I am puzzled that my request for an unblock of an IP address (range?) led to my personal account being blocked.

Accept reason:

I see no evidence at all that you are TRATTOOO. Your editing history seems to have no similarity to TRATTOOO's. Everything seems to me consistent with what you say, so I have unblocked you and granted you IP block exemption. JamesBWatson (talk) 21:19, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You may have meant to request an unblock of an IP range, but what you actually did was request an unblock of this account (which at the time was not blocked), giving "Abusing multiple accounts: TRATTOOO" as your reason for unblocking. It looked very much like a mishandled attempt to request an unblock for TRATTOOO, which made no sense unless you were the same person. I guess that this was an innocent mistake, and I would simply unblock you if it were not for one doubt in my mind. Since you have an account which was not blocked, you should have been able to edit, so why were you trying to request an unblock for an IP range? If you can give a satisfactory answer to that then it will probably be reasonable to unblock you. JamesBWatson (talk) 20:54, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if this account is a sock or not, but the IP he was editing from when he requested unblock is hardblocked, so he would not be able to edit even if he was logged in. I am unfamiliar with TRATTOOO. Still, from a purely technical aspect, I see no obvious evidence that this account is a sockpuppet. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 02:10, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your attention to this unblock request. I may well have bungled the original request to unblock the IP range; there was a text which read (more or less) "cut and paste this in your user page to request an unblock," and I did so. I was in fact unable to edit from this machine even when logged in. Fafhrdrn1154 (talk) 17:16, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. I appreciate the time and effort spent reviewing this request. Fafhrdrn1154 (talk) 21:07, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Freezing wraparound.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Freezing wraparound.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 03:38, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Avatar 23.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Avatar 23.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:14, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Fountain of light 12.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fountain of light 12.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 06:10, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Long Beach Free Press

The article Long Beach Free Press has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable newspaper. No indepth coverage. Only ref is a database entry.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:23, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Young magazine 03 10 2014 cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Young magazine 03 10 2014 cover.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:05, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Still from "They Won't Forget" showing Lana Turner.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Still from "They Won't Forget" showing Lana Turner.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ℯ xplicit 08:03, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Docrankin1921selfport.png

The file File:Docrankin1921selfport.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Docrankin1921selfport.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Docrankin1921selfport.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:04, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Old Mole 25.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Old Mole 25.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 21:12, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Berkeley barb v5 n9 cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Berkeley barb v5 n9 cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:06, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]