User talk:Fact Confirm
Welcome!
[edit]Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Editing tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Simplified Manual of Style
- Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.
Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
- Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
- Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
- Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
- No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
- If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
- Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
- Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.
The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 00:28, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
Fact Confirm, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi Fact Confirm! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 27 June 2021 (UTC) |
June 2021
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Anthony DeStefano has been reverted.
Your edit here to Anthony DeStefano was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline. The reference(s) you added or changed (https://www.newsmax.com/insiders/anthonydestefano/bio-548/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 22:37, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
Please help me! I spent hours and hours editing this page, and was meticulous to put in all the correct references. Now the whole article has been reverted and all that work wasted because of ONE website. PLEASE help me!!!
I as able to restore the page using the guidelines provided here. Thank you.
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did at Anthony DeStefano, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. Here's the thing: if you have to add Amazon links to prove the book exists, that's pretty sad. Find proper secondary sources please, and if they don't exist, don't insert the content. Drmies (talk) 01:36, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
I will attempt to go about these revisions without "disruptive editing". I will use secondary sources, but what is frustrating is that there are legitimate revisions, which have taken time to research-- for instance the NY Times article-- which have been completely cut from the article. I will add these to the most current reverted version. I am not trying to be disruptive, nor "advertising." Everything in this article has been factual. The Amazon sources were a mistaeke- not an attempt to be disruptive.