User talk:FactDistributor

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. --TechnicianGB (talk) 06:31, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Lindos. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 12:31, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

FactDistributor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was unaware of the 3R rule as I am a new user. I am not going to speak directly to the user that engaged in edit wars with me. I will try to use a mediator and refrain from speaking directly to him since our dialogue so far was not fruitful. Even though my username is FactDistributor I don't want to provoke or create issues with other users. I just like selecting funny names. Because apparently there are more rules that I have to read about the wikipedia guidelines, I will try to research codes of conduct and avoid discussions with people I think want to promote their own agendas (or in any case I see that are not interested in a sincere dialogue). FactDistributor (talk) 14:41, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It appears that your block has expired. ^{!ɘM γɿɘυϘ}⅃ϘƧ 22:23, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Friendly note

Hello FactDistributor. I understand you are very passionate about the climate of your city Lindos and its always good to have new editors on board, however as a friendly note I would like to advise you to start editing in other articles of your interest as well so you will not be perceived a SPA account. This will help you gain more experience with wikipedia and you will be able to articulate your views without being constantly attacked as a SPA account. I hope you have nice time editing!!! Weatherextremes (talk) 17:07, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]