User talk:Fabulousdiana

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons. Thank you. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 03:10, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, 'Very nice and fabulous' is not a valid edit summary. It won't work here. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 03:11, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Computer

Computer is an electronic device. It accepts data from the user as input. It stores data in the memory. It accepts commands from the users and processes the data. It gives the users the required output. Fabulousdiana (talk) 03:14, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Please stop using pointless edit summaries. The bulk of your recent edits seem to comprise "Very nice and fabulous article about ____". This is not helpful. You should explain your edits in an edit summary, like "Added reference for upcoming airdate", etc. Also, if you are here to promote Alisha Panwar like this, you seriously run the risk of having any article about her deleted from Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a promotional vehicle. Only subjects who are notable belong in articles. Debutante actresses are not inherently notable. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:09, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Again, writing "very good" for every edit summary gettins disruptive. Please read and follow the edit summary standard, as is expected of all editors who wish to contribute to our site (especially WP:SUMMARYNO that specifically describes your use). DMacks (talk) 19:52, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Fabulousdiana, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 03:06, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Don't remove templates

Re: this, please don't remove templates without providing a legitimate justification to do so. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:39, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Fabulousdiana. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]