User talk:Fabrizio111

Potential unblock

I am willing to unblock this account as long as you promise to refrain from editing articles related to House of Krug directly, and to provide full disclosure of the connection on your user page, prominently. You must also disclose that you are working in conjunction with users named at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tristan.sbry. You may use the article talk pages to suggest changes, or the {{request edit}} template to request edits. Requested edits are subject to the same editorial standards as any other, and may not be acted upon. Failure to comply with these guidelines will result in you being reblocked. Please use {{unblock | reason=your reason here ~~~~}}, and in your reason explain that you understand these guidelines, and how you intend to follow through with them. NativeForeigner ^Talk 19:37, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Fabrizio111 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I share my IP with those users : 3 I work like them in the same digental agency, but I am only dedicated on Jaeger-Lecoultre Brand in italian language. This is my personnal account, and I will respect all the rules you have mentioned just upon. Please find below an introduction of my will in Italian. --Fabrizio111 (talk) 12:26, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Accept reason:

There is no objection from the blocking administrator, so I'll unblock. Please keep the conditions above in mind; avoid editing articles you have a conflict of interest in directly and use the article's talk page to request edits instead. Buona fortuna. Kuru (talk) 00:27, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ciao a tutti,

lavoro per un'agenzia digitale che collabora con Jaeger-LeCoultre e attualmente mi occupo di un progetto che riguarda le pagine in italiano su Wikipedia. Dato che mi occupo solo delle pagine in italiano, ho creato un mio account personale su Wikipedia. Jaeger-LeCoultre apprezza tantissimo la creazione di una pagina Wikipedia dedicata alla sua azienda, con testi scritti e aggiornati da collaboratori come voi, e vorrebbe instaurare un rapporto di collaborazione più stretto con tutte le persone esperte che hanno pubblicato articoli riguardanti Jaeger-LeCoultre su Wikipedia, ma anche con tutti gli appassionati di orologi in generale. Mi piacerebbe contribuire attivamente a questo processo collaborativo, al quale anche voi avete partecipato, in modo da ottenere testi più omogenei e coerenti e condividere ulteriori informazioni su Jaeger-LeCoultre.

Mi interessa creare articoli di Wikipedia in italiano, per questo mi piacerebbe poter usare i contenuti collaborativi redatti in inglese. Ho letto attentamente le Wikipedia guidelines, in particolare la sezione “Wikipedia: PROMOTION” e “Wikipedia: FAQ/Organizations,” e ne deduco che qualunque contributo al marchio è possibile (e apprezzato) solo nel rispetto delle Wikipedia policies. Il mio obiettivo è lavorare con la vostra consulenza e condividere con voi ulteriori informazioni su Jaeger-LeCoultre.

Se siete interessati a questo progetto, contattatemi subito, così potremo parlarne più dettagliatamente. Cordiali saluti, --Fabrizio111 (talk) 12:26, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Here are a few key questions:

Do you understand that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and not a business directory?
Do you understand conflict of interest?
Do you understand that to be considered for an encyclopedia article, the subject must be notable? NativeForeigner ^Talk 19:52, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

1) Yes I totally understand Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, which means only facts coming from sources and references.

2) I know that the conflict of interest is existing in my situation and i will always take care of staying neutral. The rules you have insisted on, will also prevent any fault from my part.

3) I confess that for the "notable" part I’m not an expert. But this subject is already existing in various languages, and the Italian article is very tiny but existing. That's why I will propose a translation from the English one.--Fabrizio111 (talk) 13:23, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]