User talk:Fabrica2808

Welcome!

Hello, Fabrica2808, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Toddy1 (talk) 17:32, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mykola Azarov

Thanks for the edit you did to the article on Mykola Azarov. Wikipedia has a policy on verifiability: Wikipedia:Verifiability. Readers must be able to check that any of the information within Wikipedia articles is not just made up. This means all material must be attributable to reliable, published sources. Please could you add inline citations showing the sources of the information you added to the article. Toddy1 (talk) 17:32, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting cited information and replacing it with uncited is not helpful. Your edits to Mykola Azarov on 4 December and 20 November have therefore been reverted. You were warned about the need for citations on 20 November. Toddy1 (talk) 08:06, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Hello Fabrica2808. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Reface, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Fabrica2808. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Fabrica2808|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. HᴇʀᴘᴇᴛᴏGᴇɴᴇꜱɪꜱ (talk) 07:03, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Herpetogenesis:, hey, thanks for a notice. But I've just translated the Reface article from Ukrainian as I know both languages. I should have stated it on the Talk page. Sorry for being unattentive. I feel sorry to write an article that makes you think I am paid for it. How can I improve it? (to be frank, I shortened the article a littlbe bit and tried to find the best English language sources I could). --Fabrica2808 (talk) 12:02, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Reface

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Reface, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 1292simon (talk) 10:03, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]