User talk:Fabish Boaitey

February 2012

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31hrs for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:44, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Secret I warned you about erasing the artists names that I edited because they are associated with these people and they are facts and/or opinions anyway. I am very angry with you I am going to block you because you do not know what I do

You are not an administrator, see WP:ADMIN, also I see absolutely no article talk page discussion, user talk page discussion, or edit summaries other than some disruptive page moves. You are lucky you haven't been blocked for a further period of time. Secret ^account 23:42, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I added more to Nicki Minaj's associated acts because she is closely associated with Young Money, Gucci Mane, Kanye West and can you please block Secret because he is doubting me and I do not wanna get block and let me free blocked please

Fabish Boaitey (talk) 13:01, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

We go by WP:CONSENSUS, and the bold, revert, discuss cycle. The associated acts you added do not meet the very clear definition of "associated", and once they were removed once, you are not permitted to re-add them. Read your talkpage: it's littered with warnings of your disruptive edits. You are blocked for a very short time to give you the opportunity to re-read the policies, and rethink your edits as you move forward (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 13:11, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Eagles 24/7 (C) 19:50, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Block Solution

Eagles247 I am sorry for vandalism i am not going to do that again and editing because i am editing the ones that are true and removing the ones that are false the reason why I added more to associated acts because they are true and can you please unblock me and do not and can you please not let people block me I put Gucci Mane, Kanye West, Red Cafe, Maino & more to Nicki Minaj's page because they are her associated acts i am telling the truth i am not lying

The reason why you were blocked was because you were not vandalizing, but failing to adhere to rules stating that the "associated acts" were only for artists that had a major impact on their career, for example on the Rihanna article, Eminem is on the associated acts list because Rihanna had contributed with Love the Way You Lie, which had become very popular in 2010-11. Thank you for your understanding. --GouramiWatcher ^(Gulp) 16:39, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Iam sorry for failing to adhere that the associated acts that had a major impact on their career I added Dr. Dre, DJ Premier & Nas as Jay-Z's associated acts because they had major impacts on his career I edit & add things that are true and remove things that are false so can you please pardon me, let me off and edit, add, remove, delete and redirect things on Wikipedia because I am not trying to break the rules and cause vandalism I am trying to make things right so it is not a solution for me to be blocked if i do it and/or did it i will let you know and you can block, redirect and/or delete me until I stop my wrongdoings because I am the protagonist

Can you provide reliable sources? that it is the case? 108.132.0.8 (talk) 17:57, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for for continued adding of "associated acts" that you have been told contravene the meaning and policy. This is disruptive, and thus this block is for the overall disruption to the project. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:53, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I edited Gucci Mane as Nicki Minaj's associated acts because they work together I edit to make things right because I am very intelligent so can you please unblock me I am very sorry for vandalizing I am in the wrong and I admit it I will never do that again on my other user Fabian Boaitey I would like to unblock it it is hard can you please help me to unblock it

"intelligent" people follow the rules that they agreed to when they signed up. They also don't repeatedly re-add the same or similar information when they have been told to stop again and again. They also don't evade a block. YOU, the person are indefinitely blocked from this project: you may not create new ID, and you may not even edit anonymously until it's removed (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 13:38, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry for vandalizing and distruptive editing I will never do that again I promise can you please unblock me and let me off I am trying to make things right by editing the reason why I edit because I would like to make things tidy, right and correct i did not mean to do any harm and/or vandalize & edit distruptly on purpose it was an accident I'm still learning I do admit that I'm wrong I do eat humble pie I added Wu-Tang Clan as Gang Starr's associated acts because they work with them as well as M.O.P. because they're related to each other Secret I wasn't adding false imformation you are a liar you talk nonsense I talk sense can you please unblock me Bwilkins I edit for the right reasons because I know about Nicki Minaj's & Lil Kim's associated acts because I know about who they frequently work with can you please unblock me and/or get me unblocked & someone to unblock me Bwilkins can you please unblock me

You will not be unblocked if your intent is to continue to add so-called "associated acts". Now that you're stooping to personal attacks, I will be removing access to this talkpage. Please see WP:GAB in the future. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:18, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing your talkpage due to abuse of the unblock process. You may still contest any current block by e-mailing unblock-en-l, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

(talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:18, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Fabish Boaitey for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. GouramiWatcher ^(Gulp) 21:26, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Fabish Boaitey for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. GouramiWatcher ^(Gulp) 21:30, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]