User talk:Fabio.pisano

Welcome

Hello Fabio.pisano, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents

Department directory

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The or button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.

If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

Fabio.pisano, good luck, and have fun. – PamD 12:32, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Advice

Hallo, I see you've added several articles to Wikipedia about Lifestyle brands etc. A few points:

Please learn how to add Categories - see the changes I've made to your articles
Please check where your links are going: I've fixed a link to Patagonia which was intended for Patagonia (clothing), but you've got links to disambiguation pages in your Icon brand article.
Please do not add blog sites as External links - see WP:ELNO
You can make a link to Icon brand from the words "Icon brands" by adding an "s" at the end of the link: [[Icon brand]]s. Much neater than repeating the whole thing in a piped link.
The See Also section should not include articles which are already linked within the article.
Please don't use informal language like "it's" for "it is": this is an encyclopedia. (It's quite OK on talk pages).

There is a lot to learn about editing Wikipedia, but it is an interesting journey. Happy Editing. PamD 12:48, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Authority brand

Okay, you'll find it at User:Fabio.pisano/Authority brand! Deb (talk) 13:44, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure why you moved this back to article space without addressing the issues, but you still need to work on it so I have put it back in your user space. Deb (talk) 15:23, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, still new with these interaction. I'm searching for more material and references for the topic. Thanks for your patience :) Fabio

Nomination of Icon brand for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Icon brand is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Icon brand until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Polygnotus (talk) 07:06, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cult brand for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cult brand is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cult brand until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Polygnotus (talk) 07:10, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Symbol-intensive brand for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Symbol-intensive brand is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Symbol-intensive brand until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Polygnotus (talk) 07:10, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]