User talk:FJRasile

Volunteer grants

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Volunteer grants, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Volunteer grant. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. MadmanBot (talk) 07:31, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Double the Donation.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! CharmlessCoin (talk) 02:11, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Double the Donation concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Double the Donation, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 16:22, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Double the Donation

Hello FJRasile. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Double the Donation".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Double the Donation}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 23:01, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Laser brain (talk) 22:39, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

FJRasile (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'd like to appeal to be unblocked. I have reviewed the reasoning for my block, edits perceived as spam/promotional, and I understand why those edits were seen that way. However, this is not a spam/promotional account. In the instance viewed as spam/promotional, I was genuinely making a good-faith effort to improve the article. After reading the article that explains the spam policy, I now understand what types of links are and are not accepted, regardless of if the edits were made with the intent of being promotional or not. As fundraising is my expertise, my intent is to make valuable edits to and improve the fundraising-related articles on Wikipedia. With future edits, I will be sure that my edits add substantial educational value and only cite sources that are highly relevant and truly informational in nature. I will avoid making any edits that could be interpreted as promotional. Thank you for reviewing. I hope to continue to participate in this community.FJRasile (talk) 20:09, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

I've unblocked your account on a wp:rope basis. PhilKnight (talk) 02:22, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Laser brain: - would you object to an unblock? PhilKnight (talk) 00:18, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]