User talk:FISHERAD

Welcome!

Hello, FISHERAD, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Arnoutf 22:22, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Green Left (Green Party of England and Wales) Edit

I'm replying to the message you send me about the Green Left (Green Party of England and Wales). Clean up is very normal, we all make typo's, other small mistakes or don't know exactly what wikipedia's options are. So don't worry you didn't do anything wrong. Three small notes though:

There's nothing wrong with putting an article in many categories, aslong as the article fits into those categories. Because there are so many biographies on wikipedia, some categories are specifically ment for people and not for organizations. I removed those. Some of the categories you put on appeared not to exist, so removed those too.
What I find the cool thing about wikipedia is the linking. A large part of your text lacked links, so I added them.
A final word of warning, like you a sympathize with leftwing ideals, but wikipedia is supposed to have a neutral point of view, and it is not meant as a promotional tool. In the edit summary you wrote "As a member of the Green Left within the GPEW", quite honestly it does not sound like a good reason to create an article.

So, there is nothing with your article, and be bold! But if you have time please check out some of the general policy & guidlines of wikipedia, like The five pillars of Wikipedia. -- C mon 07:51, 10 July 2006 (UTC) (one final note, you can sign your edits by putting for tildes ~~~~ behind your post)[reply]

compliment

Nice work! – Kaihsu 14:50, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Young Greens (disambiguation)

I saw you created a disambiguation page for young greens, and linked all greens to it. I'm sory but this is not what a disambiguation page is used for, those are used for words or acrononyms with different meanings. Like the GreenLeft disambiguation you created. A category would be better here: Category:Youth wings of Green parties has already been created. I'm reverting your edits, including those organizations you found in the category, and I'll link young greens to the England and Wales one. Unless you have great objections though. -- C mon 08:44, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just thought I'd mention that I have my own Internet access now, and am making some edits to the YG article (off and on while doing other stuff). Please revert them if you disagree; I'm a bit sleep deprived (Just come back from FLOSSIE Conference; I'm setting up a FLOSSIE demo &c stall at conference--I don't know if you're interested in helping). Thanks for your work on all the GPEW articles which is really great ~~at suggesting you need a life~~ ;-).

Regarding the above, back in Jan when I did the green and youth politics WP category re-org, I did make a YGEW article (entitled Young Greens (England and Wales) which I think follows Occam's Razor better but I'm not fussed) and a List of youth wings of Green political parties (and List of green youth organisations), but I lost them both before I saved them (damn MS Windows)*.

I think it might be best to redirect Young Greens to such a list. I may have some of the list of orgs I made somewhere; if you dig around on the WWW and hundreds of Green youth mailing list archives, you'll find there's piles of (some probably not too active) Green youth groups. I find editing WP articles on organisations a bit boring but I'll try to finish that (and work on some of the non-green political orgs on WP) at some point.

[*Off topic: While my PC was down, I've been designing, on paper, an optional system for retrieving previously previewed WP articles mid-edit when logged in (with priv. controls) as I have an awful habit of not saving in bits and ending up losing most of my WP edits—at least when in MSW— and not remebering what I wrote. I don't know if you think that's a good idea. I'll dig up my notes and make proposal when I have a chance.]

Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley _talk _contrib 15:57, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Red Green

A search for "red green" leads me to a page about eco-socialism while i was looking for the article on the Canadian tv personality. You should create a disambiguation page distinguishing the two. thank you, --MontySpurling 04:16, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

History of the Green Party...

...is fantastic Aled. Many thanks Twrist 10:52, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You helped choose Environmentalism as this week's WP:AID winner

Thank you for your support of the Article Improvement Drive.
This week Environmentalism was selected to be improved to featured article status.
Hope you can help.

AzaBot 18:33, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Collapsable sections

Hi! You have done considerable work on the {{Socialism sidebar}}. There has been considerable discussion on the issue of the collapsable sections of templates like that one. I created a centralized place for discussion about this issue here. I hope you can bring your views to the discussion. - C mon (talk) 18:34, 12 March 2008 (UTC) Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Ecosocialism a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.[reply]

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut-and-paste-move repair holding pen. Thank you. M. Caecilius (talk) 07:18, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]