User talk:FILWISE

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Boboy9 (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

Welcome

Hello, FILWISE, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.

Happy editing! The Ogre (talk) 17:31, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page
How you can help
Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

Flags

Please do not put in flags into ethnic group infoboxes. This is an inappropriate use of national flags. See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ethnic groups/Archive 8 for further discussion, and the manual of style for further information. Thanks, cab (talk) 11:09, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Once again, please do not insert national flags into ethnic group infobox as you did with these edits: [1][2]. There is quite a wide consensus among your fellow editors that this use of flags is inappropriate. If you have any questions, please ask at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ethnic groups. cab (talk) 14:00, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Iranians abroad

There are no notable populations of Iranians in the three countries you added on Template:Iranian citizens abroad. I have reverted your edit. cab (talk) 08:14, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of DZBB-TV 13

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as DZBB-TV 13, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Bluemask (talk) 06:46, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of DZBB-TV 13

The article DZBB-TV 13 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

possible hoax. TV stations in the Philippines does not share call signs unless the other one is off the air.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bluemask (talk) 01:38, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Emilio Diaz

The article Emilio Diaz has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability is not inherited

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Falcon8765 (talk) 02:53, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not insert content without citing sources

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Indians in Mozambique. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. cab (talk) 15:51, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Use of fair use logos

You keep adding fair use logos to articles (example), but fail to provide any fair use rationale as required by WP:NFCC #10c. Please read WP:FURG and start providing fair use rationales before putting logos into articles. Otherwise, the logos must be removed from the articles you are putting them in, as I have been doing repeatedly. --Hammersoft (talk) 14:56, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Page moves

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give Iranian Arabs a different title by copying its content and pasting it into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other articles that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. cab (talk) 08:03, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to add that a move of this nature really needs to be discussed on the talk page first and get consensus. There is a prior discussion on the talk page supporting the present title, which conforms to our usual pattern for articles such as this. DGG ( talk ) 16:30, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Stella Banderas

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Stella Banderas requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Hairhorn (talk) 06:05, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Stella Banderas

A tag has been placed on Stella Banderas, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Eastmain (talk) 10:22, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Racist stuff and possible sock

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to Spanish people, Nordic race, Pashtun people, Celtic race, White Africans of European ancestry, and Californio, amongst other, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. STOP adding oudated racist stuf to articles. The Ogre (talk) 16:50, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And 112.201.242.217's contributions mirrors yours, are you using it as sock? The Ogre (talk) 16:22, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And now 112.201.129.19 also... The Ogre (talk) 10:51, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Last warning

This is the final warning you are receiving regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did to Spanish people, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. STOP YOUR OUTDATED RACIST EDITS! The Ogre (talk) 11:01, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dear Mikee

The article Dear Mikee has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced stub. Search for references gives no verifiable proof of notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Shearonink (talk) 14:58, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

References

Medical articles on Wikipedia must be cited by the best available evidence and written in a consistent format. A list of resources to help edit such articles can be found here. Additionally, the diberri tool will aid in the formatting of references; all one needs to do is cut and paste the results. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Cheers. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 03:18, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ileana Jacquet

The article Ileana Jacquet has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. joe decker ^{talk to me} 15:44, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Destino de Mujer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Romance (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Amor Descarado, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chao (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:24, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

References

Please use high quality references per WP:MEDRS such as review articles or major textbooks. Note that review articles are NOT the same as peer reviewed articles. Thanks and welcome to Wikipedia.

Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (please reply on my talk page) 18:37, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

References are required. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 18:18, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please add references. The addition of unreffed content means that what you have added may simply be removed. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 11:11, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Still no references? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 17:18, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Editing without providing references is disruptive. If you continue you may lose your ability to edit. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 18:53, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about SBN Live

Hello, FILWISE,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether SBN Live should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SBN Live .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Wgolf (talk) 19:55, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Philippine Headline News for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Philippine Headline News is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philippine Headline News until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wgolf (talk) 19:56, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Newsline Citybeat for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Newsline Citybeat is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Newsline Citybeat until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wgolf (talk) 19:57, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tunisian Arabic

Dear User,

As you are one of the contributors to Tunisian Arabic. You are kindly asked to review the part about Domains of Use and adjust it directly or through comments in the talk page of Tunisian Arabic.

Yours Sincerely,

--Csisc (talk) 13:54, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Smallpox

Why did you add runny nose to Smallpox? That is not in the citation. If that is a symptom, please add a citation from a WP:MEDRS. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 09:52, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Puerto Ricans

Here is another unsourced edit: You added Modern Puerto Rican culture is considered an Americanized Latin-Caribbean culture. here. Please do not add information of that significance without a citation. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 09:56, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, FILWISE. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Byzantine Empire. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Dr. K. 23:18, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017 your edits about soil in fecal sludge

You have added in several articles that fecal sludge contains soil (without a reference). This is not true when the fecal sludge comes from septic tanks; when it comes from pit latrines it could contain a little bit of soil but not significant. I have reverted a second time your edit to water pollution about dredging and bokashi. Please don't add it again before discussing it first on the talk page of the article. Otherwise it would become and edit war. See also the comment that you received in May 2017 on your talk page. If you feel strongly about dredging and bokashi then please take it to the alk page of water pollution and we can discuss it further there. EMsmile (talk) 09:44, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, FILWISE. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, FILWISE. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of DoQmentaries for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article DoQmentaries is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DoQmentaries until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. 🌴Koridas🌴 (Negotiate) 18:58, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 17 Bernard Club for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 17 Bernard Club is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/17 Bernard Club until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

----Rdp060707|talk 09:29, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Ringling brothers, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Sahaib (talk) 11:18, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Auburn color" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Auburn color and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 27#Auburn color until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 22:54, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Arvanites into Hellenization. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 21:59, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Germanic languages, you may be blocked from editing. TylerBurden (talk) 23:48, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (second request)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Ilocano language into Pangasinan language. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 13:25, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Nueva Ecija

added a link pointing to Maria Aurora

Nueva Vizcaya

added a link pointing to Casiguran

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (third request)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Aurora Quezon into Bongabon. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 11:51, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tagalog people, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Laguna.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

About your linguistic analysis

Hey, I noticed your edits in the Language section. When you have assertions about the dialectal aspects, it's better to cite references that will make them conclusive to avoid being tagged as pseudolinguistic. As an editor, gathering facts from legitimate sources is what makes the article credible, rather than conducting your analysis on things that are not part of your expertise. Liray70 (talk) 19:27, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of programs broadcast by TVE, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jorge Reyes.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Acorralada

Hello. Please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Acorralada, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.--Telenovelafan215 (talk) 06:43, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Please refrain from adding, removing or changing genres, as you did to All I See, without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. ResPM (T🔈🎵C) 10:43, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit reversion

In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.

I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. ~~~~ S Philbrick (Talk) 14:21, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Balita Ko a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. -WayKurat (talk) 07:36, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (4th request)

It appears that you copied or moved text from Pangasinan to Ilocos Region. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Repeated violations of Wikipedia's attribution requirements may result in the loss of editing privileges. DanCherek (talk) 04:57, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nueva Ecija, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Laguna.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:52, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Calanasan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nueva Era.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:02, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 5

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Calabarzon

added a link pointing to Tanay

Southern Tagalog

added a link pointing to Tanay

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 21:33, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (5th request)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Nueva Vizcaya into Cagayan Valley. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you.

You also copied text from Isabela (province) to the Cagayan Valley article without attribution arround the same time.

This is your fifth warning about the issue, so I've blocked you from editing for 48 hours to get your attention with the hopes that you'll consider abiding by these rules. -- Mikeblas (talk) 15:16, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cagayan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Piat.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:48, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Mi familia perfecta. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 02:05, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Mi familia perfecta, you may be blocked from editing. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 16:54, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello FILWISE! Your additions to Ilocano people have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 02:00, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Mikeblas courtesy ping since you blocked them for copyright stuff a few months ago. I also just had to repair attribution for Special:Diff/1237589472 (copied from Cagayan, and made well after their last block). GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 02:12, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up. FILWISE, after six copyvio warnings, I have blocked you for one month. -- mikeblas (talk) 02:22, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pampanga, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arayat.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]