User talk:FFGFlensburg

November 2020

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Nick-D (talk) 10:41, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

FFGFlensburg (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, I have tried to upload a picture of a new vehicle (ACSV G5) that was missing on the description of the List of equipment of the norwegian army. The page didnt acepted the picture, so I tried to upload again. I am the owner of the picture and the picture shows the described vehicle in the text

Decline reason:

This doesn't address the reason for your block. You are believed to be the same person behind Fonte de regaz. WP:GAB explains how to craft an acceptable unblock request. Yamla (talk) 11:48, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

FFGFlensburg (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Thank you for the reply. There is no connection to the person behind "Fonte de regaz". How can I prove that there is no connection? I created this account today to update vehicle information and the company page of our company and especially help with information that are currently missing. There is no intention to change or any articles or provide information that are not correct.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only: No reply to Yamla or Nick-D below. Feel free to open a new request when you have the time to engage with us. SQL ^{Query me!} 16:18, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Nick-D: Taking a look at the edits from this user, there's no checkuser overlap with Mr. Samerkov, the last blocked sock, and they are editing from a different part of the world. Their username is inappropriate (see WP:USERNAME and note there's a company with that name) so they'd need to change their username and commit to WP:COI, but I think it's unlikely they are part of the Fonte de regaz sock farm. And frankly, the username would explain the edits. Of course, checkuser evidence can't prove a negative but as the blocking admin, I'm wondering how sure you are here? Fonte de regaz isn't particularly sophisticated and my findings here show Unlikely. --Yamla (talk) 14:47, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla: I blocked here per WP:DUCK, but if the technical evidence doesn't support this I'd be pleased to unblock contingent on the editor here meeting the requirements set out at WP:COI, including changing their user name and providing a commitment to not edit articles linked to their employment (though they may make suggestions on article talk pages, as long as they declare their COI each time). Regards, Nick-D (talk) 07:06, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FFGFlensburg, back to you. Please read WP:COI. Tell us what you'd change your username to and commit to not editing articles directly linked to your employment, as suggested by Nick-D above. --Yamla (talk) 12:08, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]