User talk:Fahadcs007.

A page you started (Abdus Sobhan Rahat Ali High School) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Abdus Sobhan Rahat Ali High School, FAHAD CARE!

Wikipedia editor Prof tpms just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Good work.

To reply, leave a comment on Prof tpms's talk page.

Prof TPMS (talk) 23:41, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem

Hello FAHAD CARE, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Abdus Sobhan Rahat Ali High School have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Worldbruce (talk) 15:36, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Abdus Sobhan Rahat Ali High School

The section above describes various ways to surmount a copyright problem. Even if you own the copyright or are able to license the content, you will be unable to reuse it here. The material was not written for an encyclopedia, but was written to promote the school by creating pride and "school spirit" among the students, teachers, and parents. That is not the purpose of Wikipedia. The text would need to be rewritten entirely to have the right tone for an encyclopedia and to not give undue weight to information that is not encyclopedic.

The bulk of any article should be based on independent sources, in this case not on the school website. If no significant coverage of the school can be found in reliable sources independent of the school, then it should not be a stand alone Wikipedia article. In that case, a few sentences about it (sourced to the school website) should be merged to Patiya Upazila, and the school article should be redirected there. Any further details about it belong on the school website, not here. --Worldbruce (talk) 16:12, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Abdus Sobhan Rahat Ali High School for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abdus Sobhan Rahat Ali High School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdus Sobhan Rahat Ali High School until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ~Yahya (✉) • 21:29, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Abdus Sobhan Rahat Ali High School

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Abdus Sobhan Rahat Ali High School requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Abdus_Sobhan_Rahat_Ali_High_School. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Pahunkat (talk) 13:42, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Pahunkat (talk) 20:40, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of name and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions other than promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must:

Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. 331dot (talk) 08:14, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Fahadcs007. (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

fahadcs (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I'm not promoting/advertising of any business. as wikipedia direction I'm agree for changing my account's username. And my recent article which was deleted, it should be restored. Those article isn't violating any terms & conditions of wikipedia. I think it is unethically deleted.

Decline reason:

That new username is no better. Nor have you addressed your inappropriate editing. Yamla (talk) 13:38, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

N.B. The article was deleted through AfD and subsequently under G4, see Abdus Sobhan Rahat Ali High School and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdus Sobhan Rahat Ali High School. Pahunkat (talk) 12:22, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Articles do not have to violate the Terms and Conditions to be deleted. There was a community discussion about the article and it was deleted as a result. Please also review conflict of interest and paid editing. 331dot (talk) 12:35, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yamla (talk)

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Fahadcs007. (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

fahadcs (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

Why my new username is not better? my name `fahad' is already taken here, thats why I can not get this. So what should I do? I've not doing any inappropriate editing. If you think any wrong here it was mistakenly happened. And if you reviewing deleted article with neutral way you can understand those article not violate any terms and conditions of wikipedia.

Decline reason:

First, if one username you like is declined because someone else already has it, putting up the exact same name in your next request is a guarantee of failure (And actually, that account hasn't been used in nine years; we might be open to letting you usurp that account, but see these other two points). Second, there are lots of other names out there; if you're the sort of person who just has to have that username I think your chances of getting along with other people are low enough not to bother. Third, you still haven't addressed our concerns about your apparent conflict of interest. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:35, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Case (talk)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fahadcs007. (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I've not seen anyone taken my new proposed username `fahadcs'. It there any problem, you can select a name from here 'fahad_cs, realfahad, realfahadcs, fahad007, fahadcs007' and renamed my username. For `addressed our concerns about your apparent conflict of interest'; I've not any conflict of interest then, now, future about my created article which was deleted. I think that was mistakenly happened & after that I re-edited this and cut down conflicting texts from article as you're described before. You should now review recent deleted article again & I hope you will not find anything in it that violates the terms and condition.

Decline reason:

You responded to my simple question asking what you were hoping to edit in the future by trying to re-litigate an AfD. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 22:13, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

We can't pick a username for you. Please make a single choice and remove the others; it makes it difficult to rename you with what is in your request currently. 331dot (talk) 13:40, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fahadcs007, what sort of articles do you intend to edit if unblocked? _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:57, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rosguill talk It is not clear what you mean. Please don't comment from one place to another again and again, just comment in one place. Why won't my account be unblocked? And why not restored the deleted article? I already had the source attached to my article. I have already answered your question. Judge impartially without being biased. Fahadcs007. (talk 14:16, 25 December 2020 (UTC+6)

Articles are expected to meet certain sourcing standards. When articles fall short of that standard, they are nominated for AfD discussions. The outcome of the deletion discussion for the article you created was deletion because insufficient sources were provided. Repeatedly recreating the article without addressing the issues that were raised at the AfD is tendentious editing, and suggests that you may have a personal connection to Abdus Sobhan Rahat Ali High School, which is a conflict of interest.

You will not be unblocked until you can convince an admin that you intend to do something other than recreate the same article with the same problems again. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:05, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

→[User:Rosguill|Rosguill]] ^{[[User talk:Rosguill|}

I have given enough sources to contrast the articles I have created. If you can't verify, that's your disability. There are many articles on Wikipedia that do not have enough sources, but they are still in use. I am working to enrich articles on Wikipedia like other. I have not any personal profit for creating any article. If you can't read the content properly, if you can't translate it, that's your disability. You deleted the article I created because of your personal resentment. You have done this by being biased. Even after answering your question correctly, you keep saying the same thing over and over again without any reason, which shows your biased attitude. Besides, you also called my username outside the Wikipedia guidelines, which is not outside the guidelines at all. You do not know the names format of people from different countries... Many of your administrators' names violate Wikipedia's terms and conditions. Even then, they are still in force. Finally, unlock my account and restore deleted articles. I don't have enough wasted time to say the same thing over and over again. Remember, deleting an article from Wikipedia does not change the history of an organization. Fahadcs007. (talk) 18:21, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That's true, it doesn't; and if you just want to document the history of an organization, there are places to do that. Wikipedia does more than that. If you are aware of any inappropriate usernames that violate the username policy (not the "terms and conditions"), keeping in mind that some may be grandfathered, especially among longtime users, you can address that once unblocked. For that to happen, you must make another formal unblock request. 331dot (talk) 19:11, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

331dot

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fahadcs007. (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Already described reason. This is another formal unblock request

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 14:46, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fahadcs007. (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have not any intention of causing damage or disruption to Wikipedia.
Whatever the purpose of the block, since my words are not important here, I have nothing new to say about.
According to your commentary, which is 'damage or disruption', I have no such desire. Rather, I've voluntary desire to enrich Wikipedia, which I take seriously.
I will definitely be working on creating necessary content on Wikipedia in the future.

Finally, I would like to say that the admins should take proper action by checking the source of the content properly. Admins need to be more professional in this regard. Must have the ability to understand the content of any language. Deleting content in a hurry is not desirable under any circumstances. Creating a content in wikipedia is not ordinary task, it takes a lot of exertion-time behind it. So I'm hoping to unblocked, so that I can add something better to Wikipedia in the future.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or

the block is no longer necessary because you
understand what you have been blocked for,

will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and

will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 14:00, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Yamla: @331dot: Fahadcs007. (talk) 12:55, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Rosguill talk {{I'm not promoting/advertising of any business. My recent article (Abdus Sobhan Rahat Ali High School) has been deleted with speedy deletion. I mistakenly delete `speedy deletion tag'; but as described administrator of wikipedia 'there haven't find 2nd source' which isn't true. `Abdus Sobhan Rahat Ali High School' is a famous school in Patiya, Chittagong, Bangladesh. There are many newspaper produced news about this schools history-culture, it's a govt. approved school which can you verify from govt. education ministry/board's website. As wikipedia administrators direction, I already modify some text and now those articles haven't any text which is goes against wikipedias terms and condition. I request you to restore `Abdus Sobhan Rahat Ali High School' article.}}
331dot (talk

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
Fahadcs007. (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

ok, I chose it.

Decline reason:

duplicate --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:53, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Rename unsuccessful
[edit]
The chosen username is too similar to an existing username or it used to be username of someone else that got renamed: Fahadc5. Please choose again. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:03, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Deepfriedokra (talk)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
Fahadcs007. (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

.

Decline reason:

{Blank. Duplicate. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:52, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

globally renamed FAHAD CARE to Fahadcs007
[edit]
globally renamed FAHAD CARE to Fahadcs007 --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:25, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]