User talk:EzekielT

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, EzekielT. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Master of Time (talk) 18:30, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for the warm welcome :)! I wish you all the best :)! Actually, this is a huge coincidence, since today's my birthday :)! -- EzekielT (talk), 23:56, 27 September 2017 (UTC).[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, EzekielT. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Video game console edits

Please take the time to learn how we organize and write video game console articles. “Nintendo DS” does not just cover the original model. It covers every single thing called a DS. That’s how every article about systems with revisions works. Playstation 4. Xbox One. Game Boy Advance. They all cover all versions, not just the original model. So stop making those changes to the DS and 3DS articles. Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 18:04, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Sergecross73: see Nintendo DS family. Why do we have that page then?

As the header says, "This article is about the 2004 Nintendo DS game console. For the entire series, see Nintendo DS family and Nintendo DS (disambiguation).". — EzekielT ^Talk 18:30, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Also, the specifications in the infobox are for the original DS, not the DS Lite, DSi, or DSi XL. Even the infobox's picture is of the original DS. — EzekielT ^Talk 18:38, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Did you check the examples I listed above? Or actually read the entire DS/3DS articles? Or done any research at all? If you did, you’d see I’m correct in every example I could think of. Video games are a popular content area, so it’s not like every single video game console article is written incorrectly. Yes, these “family” or “product line” articles exist, but they’re just primarily an area to do a compare/contrast on features. The main article’s scope contained every variant. It’s plain as day to see. Sergecross73 msg me 20:36, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The header on the Nintendo DS page says "This article is about the 2004 Nintendo DS game console. For the entire series, see Nintendo DS family and Nintendo DS (disambiguation)." - 2004. The 2004 DS console. That means not the 2006 DS Lite. Not the 2008 DSi, or the 2009 DSi XL. Those have their own pages. -- EzekielT ^Talk 21:24, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The page may outline some things about the redesigns, but they're only tidbits. All the redesigns have their own pages: DS Lite, DSi and DSi XL. The primary scope of the page is the original DS released in 2004, as the header states. -- EzekielT ^Talk 21:27, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see how it hurts to include the original DS's sales, especially considering everything else in the infobox is about the original DS anyways. Besides, the infobox currently includes "All models combined". Not to mention that Nintendo DS family also shows how many total units were sold. -- EzekielT ^Talk 21:39, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, Im well aware of what the top of the article says. I’ve been one of the articke’s primary writers since it’s creation 9 years ago. Its a quick guide to help readers find the article they are looking for. It’s not a statement on article scope. Now then, your turn. Read. The. Article. Note how it covers all variants. Note how every example I have covers all variants. That’s how all the articles are written. And we don’t need two figures in the infobox. We could also provide breakdowns for every year. Or every region. But we don’t. Because infoboxes are just meant to cover some brief, major points. Sergecross73 msg me 00:12, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

All that aside, you are in the wrong to continually keep re-adding it without a WP:CONSENSUS. Please read WP:BRD. If some one challenges your changes, you’re not supposed to make the change again until you have a consensus that supports your stance. You’ve broken this multiple times now. Sergecross73 msg me 00:14, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

But how much the original DS sold is a major point, don't you think? And the exact same, all models sold (154.02 million) figure is already shown at Nintendo DS family. -- EzekielT ^Talk 00:20, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I also made a compromise to you by leaving the 154.02 million figure there and not deleting it. -- EzekielT ^Talk 00:22, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cousin edits.

I know you're not the one who made the real mess with the article. The person who edited following you did that. Please see the talk page before reverting any edits. Also if you would like some edits feel free to but please put them in the appropriate section. The examples section is not the appropriate section to introduce new terms. Some of the terms you brought in were useful others were not. If and when you have the key to the appropriate section please provide citations. Bobshmit (talk) 13:24, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:53, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]