User talk:Eyeresist

Welcome!

Hello, Eyeresist, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Melchoir 06:36, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Editing etiquette

Hey buddy, you accused me of violating editing etiquette, but you've yet to explain how you determined that there was this so-called "myriad tiny changes" etiquette I supposedly violated. Perhaps it's time you put up or...say you're sorry. As someone who's doing his best to contribute to Wikipedia, I'd appreciate it. Best, Dan.--DCGeist 04:34, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No need to get angry. I don't have the opportunity to check Wikipedia every single day. I'm posting a response today - and I'll try to keep it nice. - Eyeresist 07:32, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Preview button

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In the future, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. Ward3001 23:40, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gee, it was only 6 edits. How did that "clog up" the history page? Is your screen resolution 320*240? - Eyeresist 12:09, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reposting deleted content

A tag has been placed on List of conductors, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as articles for deletion. If you can indicate how List of conductors is different from the previously posted material, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article, and also put a note on Talk:List of conductors saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please feel free to use deletion review, but do not continue to repost the article if it is deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we request you to follow these instructions.

No, I can't leave a note on your talk page because you have neglected to sign your post. - Eyeresist 04:19, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Brainiac

This was posted by me in response to trollery by Gnevin (recorded here in case he deletes it):

Oh great, another Wiki troll. Look, just because you don't like the show, that doesn't give you the right to malign it in the article. Your terrible grammar and misunderstanding of the word 'pseudoscience' indicate you're not bright enough to judge one way or the other. But I'm not going to revert your mean-spirited reversion, because you're obviously going to camp the article and make sure nothing reasonable or fairminded gets a look in. Congratulations - you're the reason Wikipedia is still rightly regarded as an unreliable resource. - Eyeresist (talk) 01:29, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RfC regarding Brainiac: Science Abuse

Since you had participated in the discussion earlier, I thought you should know that there is now a Request for Comments on whether the TV show Brainiac: Science Abuse counts as science, pseudoscience, or something in-between. If you have further comments on the subjct your input here would be appreciated. -- Hi Ev 20:06, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]