User talk:Eyal-BuDo

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eyal Nir (August 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rankersbo was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Eyal Nir and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Rankersbo (talk) 09:02, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Eyal-BuDo, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Rankersbo (talk) 09:02, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eyal Nir (August 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JSFarman was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Eyal Nir and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

JSFarman (talk) 15:26, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Eyal Nir concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Eyal Nir, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Eyal Nir

Hello, Eyal-BuDo. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Eyal Nir".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Puffin ^{Let's talk!} 08:55, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Eyal Nir Sensei

Hello Eyal-BuDo,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Eyal Nir Sensei for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains^(talk) 20:34, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of BuDo-Way

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on BuDo-Way, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GPL93 (talk) 20:32, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Hello, I'm GPL93. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. GPL93 (talk) 20:33, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 21:37, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Eyal-BuDo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

all my edits and contribution to Wikipedia are based on actual facts, not trying to promote any personal profit rather sharing relevant, interesting and beneficial to many information based on my long term global activity and experience. If there is anything specific in my edits that is not in line with Wikipedia policy please point this out clearly so I can try modify accordingly or else I ask you to let me continue editing and contributing to Wikipedia Eyal Eyal-BuDo (talk) 07:15, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your only purpose here appears to be to write about yourself. We do not allow that. Please consider alternative outlets if that is what you want to do. Yunshui ^雲 _水 14:17, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What is your connection to the ITKF? 331dot (talk) 10:27, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
What is your connection to budo-way.com and Eyal Nir Sensei? ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:52, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My name is Eyal Nir, I serve as chairman of "Dento Karate Israel" which represents the ITKF in Israel. BuDo-Way is the name of the program I have created about 10 years ago that was delivered to many thousands worldwide by now and is the core of my corresponding Amazon bestseller. My man purpose is to educate and help people around the world and not gain personal profit so if you feel any of the content I have uploaded is not in line with this approach please specify and I shall try editing accordingly. Eyal-BuDo (talk) 11:24, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You don't have to gain personal profit in order to be promoting something- which is what you were doing at least as Wikipedia defines it. Wikipedia is not for merely telling about a subject; Wikipedia summarizes what independent reliable sources state about a subject, not what the subject(or its representative) wants to say about itself. Please review conflict of interest; are there any subjects that you want to edit about for which you have no conflict of interest? 331dot (talk) 11:40, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]