User talk:Extraflavor

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Pinoybandwagon (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

--Enric Naval (talk) 15:45, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May 2008

Please follow the naming conventions at Wikipedia:Naming conventions#Broadcasting about radio stations articles. --Enric Naval (talk) 02:06, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Do not duplicate article content across multiple titles. Among other things, this breaks the edit history of articles, which creates issues with the GFDL license. —C.Fred (talk) 06:00, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There's NO NEED to block me! Extraflavor (talk) 06:00, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocks are preventative, so if you cease the edits mentioned above, you're correct. —C.Fred (talk) 06:03, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Though you appear to be violating the page move policy still: "Do not move or rename a page by copying/pasting its content, because doing so destroys the edit history. (The GFDL requires acknowledgement of all contributors, and editors continue to hold copyright on their contributions unless they specifically give up this right. Hence it is required that edit histories be preserved for all major contributions until the normal copyright expires.)". That's the behaviour you need to stop. —C.Fred (talk) 06:09, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I'll stop that behavior, ONLY IF YOU DO NOT UNDO WHAT I DID TO Campus Radio Laoag. Extraflavor (talk) 06:13, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You got it right with Campus Radio Laoag that time: you explained why you were making the change on the talk page and your edit summary pointed to the talk page. See my comment at Talk:Campus Radio Laoag also. —C.Fred (talk) 06:23, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

After repeated warnings, you have again changed a radio station article to emphasize the current brand name rather than the callsigns, as called for in our standard format for radio station articles. It has become clear that you are yet another sockpuppet or meatpuppet of User:Pinoybandwagon, under the duck test, and you have been blocked as such.--Orange Mike | Talk 13:08, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of Pinoybandwagon (talk • contribs • block log • creation log). As a blocked or banned user you are not entitled to edit Wikipedia. All of your edits have been reverted.

Details of how to appeal a block can be found at: Wikipedia:Appealing a block.

Nomination of DWPL for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article DWPL is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DWPL until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MSJapan (talk) 08:57, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]