User talk:ExtraSaviour

Welcome!

Hello, ExtraSaviour, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Ana Alexander (actress), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Velella ^{Velella Talk} 21:19, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ana Alexander (actress)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ana Alexander (actress) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 21:19, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Block

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of CadAPL (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 15:48, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ExtraSaviour (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I barely use my account for edits ! I have been blocked only because of suspected sockpuppetry ! I need my account back, some admins' careless behaviour drives people to create several new accounts, I do not want that .. I only need one account ! ExtraSaviour (talk) 21:14, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You seem to be admitting to sockpuppetry here. If so, you are not eligible for unblock consideration here. If not, please specifically address the sockpuppetry claims. Yamla (talk) 21:17, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Indefinite Block?!

@NinjaRobotPirate: Can you explain to me why I'am blocked indefinitely ?! I rarely use my account to edit here, then you block by "suspecting" that I am related to another account ! That is not fair at all ! ExtraSaviour (talk) 19:36, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Right, I guess you coincidentally edit the same exact topics as CadAPL, including Syria, UEFA champions, and Ilısu Dam. Instructions are above on how to appeal your block. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:11, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@NinjaRobotPirate: I do not have to appeal my block, since you only suspect that I am related to another account which happens to have the same interests ! Why do not you give a warning so I would stop editing same topics covered by blocked accounts ?! I like football and I am from Syria, so I would say it is very common that people have the same interests ! If I am not here to contribute, you can block my account indefinitely. But it is not fair to do that only because of "suspicion" ! ExtraSaviour (talk) 21:09, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla: I have been accused of being a sock-puppet, I do not want that, I only want one account ! I mentioned that an admin blocked my account only because he suspected that I am related to an editor who edited certain articles back in 2016 or 2017 ! I am only asking for fairness, You do not have to make this platform so hostile to the limit in which people would get blocked only because of having same interests with someone else ! you can review my edits, if they are not sourced, you can prevent me from editing, indefinite block is not fair ! ExtraSaviour (talk) 21:26, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As you are clearly that user, I am revoking talk page access. Until your original account is unblocked, you are not welcome here. --Yamla (talk) 21:35, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]