User talk:Expo776

December 2010

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Murders of Channon Christian and Christopher Newsom. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. AniMate 08:51, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am not adding a personal analysis. The change I made to the article was supported by three sources already in the article which mention the murderers' race and consider this important. Perhaps you did not look at these sources? --Expo776 (talk) 09:00, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Murders of Channon Christian and Christopher Newsom. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors. If unsuccessful, then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Dougweller (talk) 10:47, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As if you are a neutral third party. --Expo776 (talk) 00:26, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Expo776, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! User:Smith Jones 19:18, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ANI discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Dougweller (talk) 06:16, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for misreading the Tammy Chapman AfD -- the AfD you started was clearly a violation of WP:Point but I've !voted delete on the Tammy Chapman AfD. Dougweller (talk) 06:55, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vanessa Coleman.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Vanessa Coleman.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 06:25, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]