User talk:ExplicitImplicity/Archive2

hi

Cool page. I thought all of your feedback was interesting and thoughtful. :) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jchristie7 (talk • contribs) 01:58, 22 July 2007.

Deletion Review: Pataphor

I hope you'll leave your opinion on the matter, if you think it should remain. Thanks, jchristie7

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2007_July_22

re: sock

Yes, unfortunately I have used sock puppets, although it happened slowly and I didn't mean it as an insult to anyone, but it was a mistake and I'm sorry. You're a good and true person, and I wish you well.

Aesthetics project

The reception seems luke warm for getting a bot to tag articles as part of these fields in philosophy. I think after people see the result they will be quite pleased. I am going to propose that we get a bot to tag articles for one task force just to see how it goes. I think the Aesthetics project is ready for this. I listed some categories whose articles all should be within the Aesthetics project there. I am going to forward a request to the bot in about a week unless there is an outcry against it. (Which I would not understand at all.)

I haven't announced this proposal on the WP:PHILO discussion yet. I wanted to give you a shot at commenting on it first since you are active in the project. I just want to move this forward. Any help would be appreciated. Gregbard 03:46, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Spinalcord trirev vexedlamina.svg

It's a beautiful image, but there's a typo: it's Rexed lamina, not "Vexed". --Arcadian 00:17, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for pointing this out to me, i changed it. It was already there in the picture from which i got all the labels. Which makes my being an amateur in neurology really obvious. Some things have to give.-- ExpImp^talkcon 22:50, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bellhop

I have added an image to the Bellhop article per your {{reqphoto}} request. -Gr0ff

awesome. the page gained considerable explanatory power. thank you very much.-- ExpImp^talkcon 23:42, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:ASEA logo modern.png}

Thank you for uploading Image:ASEA logo modern.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 20:09, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Aeschylus

Hi, I found a mismatch between your Aeschylus quote and the quote that appears in your source (http://www.english.emory.edu/DRAMA/Aesch.html). The disputed word is "despair". Your source quotes "despite" in its stead. A google search for that quote shows more results for "despair" than for "despite". "Despite" could make more sense and the source of "despair" might be Kennedy's probable misquote in his speech (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OCg05pTYt0A) after Martin Luther King Jr's death. You can actually hear him stuttering before saying "despair".

Interesting, huh!?

Best regards,

Bruno

(bruno.testa@gmail.com)

--189.62.166.13 (talk) 16:10, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:Johnny_depp_ecb29.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:Johnny_depp_ecb29.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 03:58, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Brookfield multiplex logo.gif)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Brookfield multiplex logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 01:03, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It is not orphaned now. It is used in Multiplex (company). Hope that settles it.-- ExpImp^talkcon 11:39, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, it still is orphaned, the image used there is File:Brookfield multiplex logo.png (note the .png version and not the .gif version) Skier Dude (talk) 15:41, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

i added a speedy deletion tag.-- ExpImp^talkcon 16:56, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Safflower

Hi. I just came across your question on Talk:Safflower. The answer is yes, and I have added your photo to the article and also fixed the categories on the Commons page. --Una Smith (talk) 22:12, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:ASEA logo modern.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:ASEA logo modern.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 10:02, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Fdb membershipcard.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fdb membershipcard.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:08, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thy dawn

Is absolutely rad. Kudos. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.122.223.227 (talk) 03:53, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:19, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]