User talk:Expert on studies of mathematical rizz

May 2024

Hello, I'm Egsan Bacon. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Chasiv Yar have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Egsan Bacon (talk) 04:29, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I would certainly agree. The information which proceeds from my knowledge is, that, in fact, the statement which you just said is, in fact, undoubtedly and infallibly correct, right, and understandable. Further statements from you seem to be accurate, as you previously have messaged me about this “dilemma”. I understand you reversed my changes, as they may not have been 100% true. I understand what you mean. Expert on studies of mathematical rizz (talk) 04:36, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Cyclonial. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Alameda High School, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —Cyclonial (talk | contributions) 18:39, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Brett Ausmus

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, the introduction of inappropriate pages, such as Draft:Brett Ausmus, is considered vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – dudhhr^talk_contribs^she_her 21:58, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brett Ausmus (May 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jlwoodwa was:

It appears that your submission is either an attempt to be humorous rather than factual, or is an obvious hoax. As Wikipedia strives to contain only factual entries, we can not accept your submission at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Brett Ausmus and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

jlwoodwa (talk) 21:59, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is about a fictional character in my fictional world. It is factual, since it is about a fictional character. Expert on studies of mathematical rizz (talk) 22:01, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Expert on studies of mathematical rizz! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! jlwoodwa (talk) 21:59, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 22:12, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I do not intend to crest hoax edits. My most recent draft, which has been submitted for review, is a fictional character, and is therefore not a hoax. Please kindly reconsider accepting my draft. In regards to my other Wikipedia edits, those were simply misunderstood. Expert on studies of mathematical rizz (talk) 22:53, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]