User talk:Expert3007

question1

Any particular reason you are trying to hide that there are other founders to Intelius besides Naveen Jain? ClaudeReigns (talk) 21:53, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

question2

To user Expert3007- the links you have added all belong to one company. This is in violation of WP:conflict_of_interest. You may not use Wikipedia as a free linkfarm. Any page with external links should share a diversity of links, particularly ones not all owned by the same business interest. --User:plausible_deniability UTC 06:43 08-Jan-02.

COI

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
and you must always:
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest. Thank you. --Ronz (talk) 17:04, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

While I'm not certain if you have a COI, I've added your name to a current discussion: Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#Naveen_Jain. I hope you'll contribute to the discussion. Thanks! --Ronz (talk) 17:04, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

White pages

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on White pages. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. --Ronz (talk) 17:12, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Links

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. --Ronz (talk) 19:35, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

White pages

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article White pages, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 01:59, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Naveen Jain

I have nominated Naveen Jain, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naveen Jain. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Nightseeder (talk) 23:38, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]