User talk:ExperiencedArticleFixerBot

Hi! I'm not a bot! I’ll create articles on Latin American academics to even their underrepresentation in Wikipedia.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Leonardo Levinas (November 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Significa liberdade was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Levinas likely passes Wikipedia's notability guidelines for academics. However, this article relies too heavily on primary sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Leonardo Levinas and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 02:20, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ExperiencedArticleFixerBot! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 02:20, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your username

Hello, ExperiencedArticleFixerBot! I noticed some of your contributions and the disclaimer at the top of your user page and this page. However, I have some bad news—your username unfortunately needs to be changed under Wikipedia's policy on misleading usernames (part of the broader username policy). Having the suffix "bot" in your username implies that this account is actually some sort of automated program.
I am very sorry that this username conflicts with current policy. For future reference, you can request a username change at Wikipedia:Changing username/Simple. — 3PPYB6 ^{(T / C / L)} — 14:52, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "ExperiencedArticleFixerBot", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it contains the suffix "-bot", which is generally reserved for authorized bot accounts. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may file for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account and use that for editing. Thank you. Sideswipe9th (talk) 19:03, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics - gender and sexuality

You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Sideswipe9th (talk) 19:04, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

At Talk:Anti-gender movement

Hello! I reverted your comment here because it appeared to be more interested in discussing or legitimizing this movement's beliefs, and not a serious desire to improve the article.

The article text recognizes that using "gender" (as in "gender ideology") in this way is an empty signifier, and does not indicate any particular viewpoint (the term is a catchall for transgender rights, gay rights, feminism, and "all that conservative Catholics despise). Nonetheless, "anti-gender" is how most sources appear to describe this movement (not to be confused with related anti-trans movements like Gender-critical).

I hope I wasn't too harsh. If you have sources which support a better name for the article, I encourage you to reopen the discussion as a WP:Requested move. –RoxySaunders 🏳️‍⚧️ (💬 • 📝) 19:13, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe it appeared that way to you. You were wrong. I have no idea what made you think that and given the flag in your signature I believe you’re being overly zealous. The article doesn’t say that “gender” is an empty signifier, as you incorrectly point out. What it says is that one source contends that “gender ideology” is an empty signifier. I have a serious interest in improving the article. I thought comments were to be answered, rather than reverted. The title of the article is obviously nonsense given that most members of that movement believe in genders. It’s a simple matter of logic. ExperiencedArticleFixerBot (talk) 19:23, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

Your account has been blocked from editing Wikipedia because your username, ExperiencedArticleFixerBot, contains the suffix "-bot", which is generally reserved for authorized bot accounts. Your username is the principal reason for the block. You are welcome to continue editing after you have chosen a new username that complies with Wikipedia's username policy.

Please take a moment to either create a new account, or request a username change of your current account here. The new username that you choose must comply with Wikipedia's username policy.

To create a new account with a different username, simply log out of this account and then click here to make a new one.
If you prefer to change the username of this account, you may do so by adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page (this page): {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken and in use by another account. You can go here to search and see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is available to be taken.

Appeals: If your username is not in violation of Wikipedia's username policy, and if you believe that this block was incorrect or made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the following text to the bottom of your user talk page here: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Thank you. Primefac (talk) 19:45, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Leonardo Levinas

Hello, ExperiencedArticleFixerBot. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Leonardo Levinas, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:05, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Leonardo Levinas

Hello, ExperiencedArticleFixerBot. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Leonardo Levinas".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:19, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]