User talk:Expansionofthecenturies
October 2023
[edit]
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Muslim conquest of Spain, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. M.Bitton (talk) 20:30, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Rashidun Caliphate, you may be blocked from editing. Some of your edits appear to promote a specific point of view, in violation of Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy. Please use the talk page to discuss these kinds of issues with any article. R Prazeres (talk) 20:37, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Rashidun Caliphate. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. R Prazeres (talk) 20:39, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Start using the talk pages to discuss proposed changes, as previously requested, or you will be reported to administrators. R Prazeres (talk) 20:58, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Materialscientist (talk) 21:26, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
[edit]
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.