User talk:Exogear

Exogear, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Exogear! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

June 2018

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Tom and Jerry: Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Broadwaygenius (talk) 14:21, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm David Biddulph. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to User talk:172.58.3.13 have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. You shouldn't, in general, remove an editor's comments from his own user talk page, see WP:TPO and WP:User pages. --David Biddulph (talk) 18:20, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have also reverted your edits to User talk:68.146.84.92 where you reinstated messages which the IP had already seen and deleted; see WP:UP#CMT. - David Biddulph (talk) 18:28, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at User talk:Gabrielfoxxer. Such edits are disruptive, and may appear to other editors to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Flat Out (talk) 11:32, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

Why do you keep reverting other people's talk pages?2602:302:D172:3220:A4DA:D412:C364:AD2F (talk) 23:43, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can’t help my habits of being a neat freak Exogear (talk) 00:28, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.

Even if I'm wrong on this, and I'm pretty sure I'm not, your edits are quite disruptive. --Yamla (talk) 12:15, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Exogear (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I’m not actually ScooterBeanieBoo. You got the wrong personExogear (talk) 12:52, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Account is now globally locked. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 09:17, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Exogear (talk) 12:47, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you address your disruptive edits, too. It's inappropriate going around changing other people's comments. If you convince another admin that you'll stop with your disruptive editing, I would not object to them lifting the block. --Yamla (talk) 12:58, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you go back through his previous contributions, he's also been telling other IPs to "refrain from editing" after undoing unconstructive changes made by said IPs. As well as adding the

Older warnings and/or other comments on this page have been removed, but are still viewable in the page history.

template to talk pages after they were reverted back. So given him changing other people's comments and him vandalizing other people's talk pages, he should remain blocked.--User:12.252.63.198