User talk:Exoarch
February 2016
[edit]
Hello, I'm Stesmo. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the main body of List of open access journals. Generally, any relevant external links should be listed in an "External links" section at the end of the article and meet the external links guidelines. Links within the body of an article should be internal Wikilinks. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Stesmo (talk) 03:11, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
Exoarch, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi Exoarch! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 19:53, 25 February 2016 (UTC) |
Proposed deletion of PeerJ Computer Science
[edit]
The article PeerJ Computer Science has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Non-notable new journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources (only sources are a press release and the journal's website). Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 12:36, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of PeerJ Computer Science for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article PeerJ Computer Science is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PeerJ Computer Science until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Randykitty (talk) 16:18, 26 February 2016 (UTC)