User talk:ExecutiveWashington

October 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mamaroneck, New York may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

|leader_name = Nancy Seligson ([[Democratic Party (United States|D]])<ref>{{cite web|last1=Donnelly|first1=Brian|title=Five

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:24, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Forest Park, Ohio may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

|leader_name = Charles Johnson ([[Democratic Party (United States|D]])<ref>{{cite web|title=Hamilton County Officials 2016|url=http:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:01, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Beech Grove, Indiana may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

States)|R]], 4th)<br/>Dave Harrison ([[Democratic Party (United States)|D]], 5th)<br/>Jim Brooks ([[Democratic Party (United States|D]], AL)<br/>Buddy Templin ([[Democratic Party (United States)|D]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:57, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Party affiliations of South Australian district councillors

Good afternoon ExecutiveWashington. I noticed that you have put a lot of work into tables of current councillors of SA local government, with a column for their political party. I don't want to just remove that column, but I feel that it is misleading, or at least presenting undue weight, since council candidates do not generally campaign on party platforms. Despite several of them being members of political parties, and duly declaring that, they stand for local government as independents, without party backing. How do you feel about removal of that column? I did notice that my 2013 Palmer United Party candidate has not declared current PUP membership. --Scott Davis ^Talk 04:30, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Scott. You do bring up a good few points. And you are right that a lot of councillors don't generally campaign on their party affiliation. However, I feel like that if one councillor declares its party in the city's register of interests, I would add its party affiliation to the council. Besides, a lot of the councillors are still independents and most don't really declare their party affiliations in the register of interests. It's also cited as well. Besides, some of NSW local government areas have councillors with party affiliations, so why not add that information to some of the councillors in SA? ExecutiveWashington (talk) 05:26, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think that NSW local government is much more party-based than SA is.

I'm afraid I split the conversation, by also posting to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Adelaide#party column in lists of current councillors, so it would be better for us to recombine the conversation to just that one open forum rather than your talk page, if that's OK by you. I'll let you comment there rather than me continuing this fork. --Scott Davis ^Talk 07:48, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 18 September

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that some edits performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. They are as follows:

On the Bellingen Shire page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
On the City of Liverpool (New South Wales) page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check these pages and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:18, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, ExecutiveWashington. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, ExecutiveWashington. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, ExecutiveWashington. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]