User talk:Exclusive hall

Welcome!

Hello, Exclusive hall, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page Dorothy A. Brown, have removed content without an explanation. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page and how to develop articles
Help pages
Tutorial
Article wizard for creating new articles
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Hugh (talk) 23:44, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

Hello, I'm HughD. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Dorothy A. Brown without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Hugh (talk) 03:03, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Dorothy A. Brown, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Hugh (talk) 00:54, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for supplying an edit summary of "Deleted this information to remove potentially libelous reporting", with the most recent of your recent three deletions of multiple paragraphs and references from Dorothy A. Brown. May I please refer you to a recent discussion of a similar deletion of content from the same article with a similar edit summary "Attempting to remove libellous information from page" by a different editor? Please see User_talk:Jstrongshaw. There it was explained to that editor that "...the well-sourced material you removed was in no way libelous...". May I suggest we read together and discuss Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle? Once an edit is reverted, we try to avoid Wikipedia:Edit warring. May I respectfully suggest that if you believe some content is libelous that you make your case on the relevant talk page Talk:Dorothy A. Brown. Thank you and welcome. Hugh (talk) 18:00, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Dorothy A. Brown. Hugh (talk) 06:15, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Public Information CCC (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mike V • Talk 06:05, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]