User talk:Ex dj

WP:COI/WP:PAID

Please read and follow thanks. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 11:08, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war warning

Your recent editing history at Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach a dead end, you can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jytdog (talk) 18:49, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Socking

Please explain the relationship between this account and Ex Pro DJ. You can do that here, just below this note. Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 18:54, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please reply here. Jytdog (talk) 19:12, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest in Wikipedia

Hi Ex dj. I work on conflict of interest issues here in Wikipedia, along with my regular editing, which is mostly about health and medicine. Your edits to date as well as [[those of Ex Pro DJ are promotional with regard to Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound. I'm giving you notice of our Conflict of Interest guideline and Terms of Use, and will have some comments and requests for you below.

Hello, Ex dj. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. Editing for the purpose of advertising or promotion is not permitted. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.

Comments and requests

Wikipedia is a widely-used reference work and managing conflict of interest is essential for ensuring the integrity of Wikipedia and retaining the public's trust in it. As in academia, COI is managed here in two steps - disclosure and a form of peer review. Please note that there is no bar to being part of the Wikipedia community if you want to be involved in articles where you have a conflict of interest; there are just some things we ask you to do (and if you are paid, some things you need to do).

Disclosure is the most important, and first, step. While I am not asking you to disclose your identity (anonymity is strictly protecting by our WP:OUTING policy) would you please disclose if you have some connection with companies that make and sell these devices (including the foundation, directly or through a third party (e.g. a PR agency or the like)? You can answer how ever you wish (giving personally identifying information or not), but if there is a connection, please disclose it. After you respond (and you can just reply below), I can walk you through how the "peer review" part happens and then, if you like, I can provide you with some more general orientation as to how this place works. Please reply here, just below, to keep the discussion in one place. Thanks~ Jytdog (talk) 18:57, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your Talk page. Ex dj (talk) 19:09, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your note. You did not reply to the question actually asked. I asked you to disclose any connections you have with companies that make and sell these devices, including the LIPUS Foundation, directly or indirectly. I did not ask you to judge whether or not you have a COI. Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 19:12, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]