User talk:Everetthighschool

It has been established that you engaged in sockpuppetry by evidence presented here:
Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Everetthighschool2, and you are therefore blocked for period of {{{period}}}.
You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires.

Hello

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for writing the article Everett-Snohomish_Riverfront. Unfortunately, it doesn't conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new articles, and has, as a result, been marked for deletion. However, please do not be disheartened by what may or may not happen to your first article, if indeed it is deleted - please continue to edit Wikipedia and add articles which conform with the inclusion criteria. For help, see Help:Contents. To find out what will probably be deleted, see Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion and Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not. Thanks, and if you have any questions, please ask them on my user talk page. To do this, click on my name (just after this sentence) and click discussion at the top and then the (+) button at the top. Xarr☎ 11:22, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Everett-Snohomish Riverfront, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Real estate development, does not assert notability

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Xarr☎ 11:22, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

Since you are students of a high school whose article you plan to edit, I'm going to give you the standard template regarding situations where an editor may be too familiar with his or her subject to write about it neutrally. Here goes:

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
and you must always:
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

Accounts used solely for blatant self-promotion may be blocked without further warning.

For more details, please read the Conflict of Interest guideline. Thank you. Best regards. Yechiel Man 05:49, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

I don't know why you haven't been warned before, but all of your edits have been vandalism. You need to stop, now. So, getting right to the point:

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. --barneca (talk) 02:22, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our polices concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. -- The Anome 08:06, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Everetthighschool2 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Wikidudeman ^(talk) 17:25, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely.¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 21:29, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]