User talk:Evenyscrewd

Please stop adding unconstructive material to Chris Benoit. Wikipedia is not a memorial. Rdfox 76 02:21, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do you think youre funny? Dont disrespect someone who died. I hope you get banned from Wikipedia.BlueShrek 02:23, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Untitled1xm4.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Untitled1xm4.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:10, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Untitled1xm4.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Untitled1xm4.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:22, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Evenyscrewd

A tag has been placed on Evenyscrewd requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Baccyak4H (Yak!) 16:24, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What is your problem?

I added the SOURCED and OFFICIAL poster to the article. You add a image that appears to be fake (it's not from WWE or one of the PPV companies that get the official posters early), has no source, no copyright tag. Please stop putting your fake poster in unless you have proof that it is real (and appearing on a dirt website is not proof). TJ Spyke 01:46, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Here is where you are wrong. You uploaded a poster and provided no info (which means the image will be deleted). I added a poster from a RELIABLE source (In Demand is usually the first source to have the posters for TNA PPV's and sometimes the first for WWE PPVs, so they are reliable) and every legit right to revert your edit since any impartial person would agree that my image is more legit and actually done right (see WP:IMAGE). TJ Spyke 01:53, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My poster IS from a PPV provider (which you would have known if you checked the page for the image I uploaded, where I provided the source). The legit poster I uploaded is from In Demand (which I already told you). In Demand has never put up a fake wrestling poster before, and I doubt they would start now. TJ Spyke 02:02, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Survivor Series (2007)

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your image was inserted successfully into Survivor Series (2007), and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. --Aaru Bui ^DII 01:58, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

September 2007

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Survivor Series (2007). Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. The Hyb rid 02:32, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Wrestling Forum

A tag has been placed on Wrestling Forum requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —BK 4 ME 02:21, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]