Jump to content

User talk:Evear78

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hey, I noticed you have been updating some articles about Nicole Wray. The problem is, none of the sources you cite check out. All of the sources you give as references for your latest additions are either dead links, or entirely unreliable links. Reliable music journalism (Vibe, Rolling Stone, XXL, MTV.com etc.) turns up nothing on any new album, and neither does allmusic.com, which is usually pretty complete. Do you have ANY real sources for this new information you have added? When an artist comes out with a new album, there's usually SOMEBODY who notices, and I can't find anyone except you that has noticed. Why is that? --Jayron32.talk.contribs 03:12, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Changes (Nicole Wray), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as articles for deletion. If you can indicate how Changes (Nicole Wray) is different from the previously posted material, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article, and also put a note on Talk:Changes (Nicole Wray) saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please feel free to use deletion review, but do not continue to repost the article if it is deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we request you to follow these instructions. Mdsummermsw (talk) 12:16, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back, Soccermeko

--Jayron32.talk.contribs 19:11, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You can't accuse me of something that I don't know about. And for that reason, you have no proof of me being a (sockpuppet) if that's what your talking about. Evear78 (talk) 17:47, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, the checkuser evidence sited above shows that you edit from the same IP addresses as Soccermeko. Given that you also have the same problems with English grammar as Soccermeko does, as well as the fact that you made the exact same types of edits to the exact same articles, then yes, it is quite clear that you are Soccermeko. --Jayron32.talk.contribs 01:57, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Accused

If you going to accuse me of something, you need to explain what your talking about. Evear78 (talk) 14:06, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]