User talk:Evasive101

RFC Mike Jones

I've started a Request for Comment on Mike Jones (rapper). Since you added or reverted a edit pertaining to the subject matter of the RfC, you may be interested in contributing your opinion/statement at Talk:Mike_Jones_(rapper)#Request_for_Comment --Ted 22:34, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I see you are continuing to revert edits about the VEISHEA performance by Mike Jones, but you haven't added any comments to the RFC that I started to determine the noteworthyness of the incident. I was hoping you would put up a rebuttal to dispute the notability of the incident (and whether or not it should be included in the article about Mike Jones), but if you fail to participate in the discussion, I may have to "cry" 3RR violation. --Ted 15:33, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Americandreamcover.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:L 8ca864fda1bc1514fb40631678c0b5d4.jpg. The copy called Image:L 8ca864fda1bc1514fb40631678c0b5d4.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 00:00, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Americandreamcover.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Americandreamcover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 19:17, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Mrjonescover.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Mrjonescover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:23, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems

Hello. Concerning your contribution, The voice of the streets, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material without the permission of the author. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/headline/entertainment/5315151.html. As a copyright violation, The voice of the streets appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. The voice of the streets has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:The voice of the streets and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:The voice of the streets with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:The voice of the streets.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Caknuck (talk) 08:04, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]