User talk:Evanh2008/IPs

Hello,

I've added a reply to your question about "in hospital". 96.46.196.36 (talk) 03:49, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm User 81.138.2.36 and I noticed you mentioned me on the genre warring thing. Sorry if I made some trouble or confusion, I noticed that the genre had been changed on the Led Zeppelin article which had been left there for ages. Sorry if I did anything bad, I tried to help as this recent thing with the user with an IP starting with a 46 was editing all the album articles and I wanted to say I'm not the guy and I wasn't trying to vandalize any pages. I'm sorry if I did anything wrong, I'm just writing to you to explain what I was trying to do. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.138.2.36 (talk) 22:07, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No, you did everything absolutely right, and I apologize for the confusion. We need more edits like those, so welcome! Evanh2008 ^{(talk|contribs)} 22:18, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for taking caution though and thank you for making me feel welcome and those other edits I did, sorry about them too, it was as it was changed while the genre was on the article for ages I thought someone edited because of opinion but I was apprehensive as I might get in trouble so again, I'm very sorry for the confusion. I accept what you did though as you were trying to help too but thanks for the apology though. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.138.2.36 (talk) 22:25, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Green Lantern

The article does not make the statement that is attributed to it. If it had, then the facts do contradict that statement.

The Dark Knight Rises 2012 $1084439099.00 Iron Man 3 2013 $1182023292.00 The Avengers 2012 $1511757910.00

With box office figures of $1084439099, $1182023292.00 and $1511757910.00 this would definitely contradict that the general public had decreased interest in Super Hero's films.

86.135.232.115 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 21:32, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the problem is that the source you gave doesn't say anything about TDKR's success contradicting the idea that lack of public interest in superhero films was a reason behind Green Lantern's failure. Maybe audiences had no interest in superhero films in 2011, but became interested again in 2012/2013. The source doesn't say anything about it, so we can't comment. Taking two events that appear, in your view, to rule out a certain explanation for one of them, is synthesis, and we can't do that here. Evanh2008 ^{(talk|contribs)} 21:36, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You're correct, of course, that the source doesn't say that GL's failure was due to lack of interest, so removing that statement isn't a problem. Evanh2008 ^{(talk|contribs)} 21:42, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ping back

Left you my rationale for the Tsarnaev addition at User talk:128.211.178.12. Not sure if you have it on your watch list. Reply and edit the article when you can. -- 128.211.178.12 (talk) 22:26, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

III Kings

Your deletion of your own question in WP:RD/H seems a bit bizarre, but for what it's worth, I was about to post this answer:

See Books of Kings#Textual history. At one time the books 1–2 Samuel and 1–2 Kings were called 1–4 Kings.

Please do not reply at this IP address's talk page. --65.94.50.15 (talk) 19:50, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]