User talk:Evangelion883

Welcome!

Hello, Evangelion883, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Mushroom (Talk) 02:10, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

bad edits

don't edit based on one opinion on the talk page, particularly if it's going against one other opinion with its merits as well. edits are supposed to be done after consensus. edits similar to your own to playstation 3 may be considered an edit war, which is unacceptable on Wikipedia. --24.7.86.143 05:45, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain

Please refrain from edits like your recent one in Scientology that amount to little more than vandalism. Thanks --Justanother 03:22, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unacceptable

Your recent rewrite of the Valentine's Day entry is in clear violation of Wikipedia policies. Such behavior will not be tolerated. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kisama (talk • contribs) 22:01, 16 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Seriously, stop

Your recent edits to the Ronald Reagan article are also in violation of Wikipedia's policies. Cocomonk22 (talk) 08:35, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last warning

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Ronald Regan, you will be blocked from editing. ~ User:Ameliorate! ^{(with the !) (talk)} 08:44, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Micki Free

I have nominated Micki Free, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Micki Free. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Oo7565 (talk) 02:32, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to User:1007D has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Monty ₈₄₅ 05:16, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 05:20, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please note this block may be extended following a review of your edits. It appears from a glance at your contributions that despite a few constructive edits, vandalism is a pattern for you. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 05:20, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 05:23, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of PowerBar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article PowerBar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PowerBar until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 21:16, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]