User talk:Evan sandoval/sandbox

Evan: Good job with the work that you've been doing on the Media consumption article. I copied the paragraph that you added in your sandbox User page here to give some comments. See them below along with the paragraph you created:

The reach of media is expanding globally and with this television has become a vice around the world. Television addiction has been labeled as the plug in drug since 1977.[1] Over the years televisions are now located in almost every home. [Evan: Rather than stating that TVs are "now located in almost every home." It would be helpful if you could find a source that provides a statistic that says the percentage of U.S. homes that have T.V.s.] Television can have a negative impact on adolescent and cause them to behave in manners that are not a part of normal social norms. [Please give a bit more detail here. What are the social norms that you are referencing? The average adolescent in high school watches on average 14 hours of television a week this show that a child will spent more time watching tv [T.V. should be written like this] then the time spent in high school. Television can be a very powerful medium for children while they can have a positive effect on a child's development this can also have a negative effect a negative effect [this can be removed] that television can lead to is violence.[2]

Prof.bgreg (talk) 18:22, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

draft feedback

@Evan sandoval: Hi! It looks like you're going in the right direction with this. The biggest suggestion I have at this point is to focus on attributing ideas in the text to the sources. Instead of 'some people' or 'studies show', be specific in the text about who says what, what studies have been done, and so on. Here's some key advice: Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Words_to_watch#Unsupported_attributions. --Sage (Wiki Ed) (talk) 18:20, 10 March 2017 (UTC)