User talk:EvanED

You might want to see [1]

Thanks

4 the DYN_DATA correction. :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 221.128.147.233 (talk) 07:10, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

C++0x

Regarding this revision, where you removed an empty section with an expand-section tag, you may want to read this discussion. Another editor felt that a criticisms section was desirable to attain a balanced article. In the interest of consensus, it might be polite to leave it in. --Sacolcor (talk) 16:22, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:12, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]