User talk:Eurowit1234
May 2012
[edit]Your removal of chart performances of Loreen has been reverted.--BabbaQ (talk) 11:40, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
- I have now also reverted many of you other unexplained deletions. I have to warn you that major deletions without explainations or consensus from the community could be seen as vandalism.--BabbaQ (talk) 11:46, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
The article Fires (Ronan Keating album) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Per WP:CRYSTAL. No verifiable information given about this future release. It's WP:TOOSOON for an article.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹Speak 15:58, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of Fires (Ronan Keating album) for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fires (Ronan Keating album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fires (Ronan Keating album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹Speak 16:11, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 16:46, 27 May 2012 (UTC)- That block is now indefinite, as this account has been used to evade blocks on other accounts. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:32, 28 May 2012 (UTC)