User talk:EuropeanHistory2011

Welcome

Hello EuropeanHistory2011 and welcome to Wikipedia! I am Ukexpat and I would like to thank you for your contributions.

Getting Started First steps • FAQ • Article creation wizard Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting help Community Portal • Help desk • Teahouse • Village Pump Where to ask questions or make comments • Request administrator attention Wikipedia: The Missing Manual Place {{helpme}} on your talk page and a small message explaining the problem The Commmunity Build consensus • Resolving disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists		Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Click here to reply to this message.

ukexpat (talk) 15:50, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Constantin-François Chassebœuf

I have reverted (undone) your recent edit to this article. The "See also" section should only list existing Wikipedia articles. Hope this helps.--ukexpat (talk) 15:51, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, EuropeanHistory2011. You have new messages at Ukexpat's talk page.
Message added 16:04, 24 July 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

ukexpat (talk) 16:04, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Enough is enough

PLEASE READ WP:SEEALSO - this clearly states that the "See also" section is for links to existing Wikipedia articles. There is no Hotel Volney Opera article (see, it's a red link) so the text you are adding does NOT belong in the See also section. It is as simple as that. Continued re-addition will be considered disruptive editing and will have consequences.--ukexpat (talk) 16:18, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have also now removed (twice) the reference to Krystal Volney. This person does not have a Wikipedia article so a reference to her in Constantin-François Chassebœuf is completely unnecessary and gratuitous.--ukexpat (talk) 16:38, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you refusing to discuss this? You are rapidly approaching 3 reverts.--ukexpat (talk) 16:42, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:EuropeanHistory2011 reported by User:FreeRangeFrog (Result: ). Thank you. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 16:49, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Hello, EuropeanHistory2011. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Constantin-François Chassebœuf, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Cindy(talk) 16:50, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:31, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

All of these Wikipedia profiles need to get a life and realize that not everyone thinks like you. Why do you care so much that you log on every day to see if an article has changed or if the person's name has a biography? Silly rabbits. Trix is for kids. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.107.85.240 (talk) 01:00, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well, they care because they don't have a life and they think they're funny. Perhaps, these silly rabbits should go visit South Park. Pray to the heavens that your lives would have another purpose than cyberstalking someone you don't know on Wikipedia because there isn't a biographical article. You are breaking the rules on the free encyclopedia so stop being hypocrites. I read somewhere that UKExpat is a member of the Ku Klux Klan. No really?! Please buy a ticket to new york and visit the statue of liberty. The President of the USA is of mixed race "Black" African American. You really need to do something else with your time. Go run a marathon or something. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.170.202.120 (talk) 01:17, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--ukexpat (talk) 19:26, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]