User talk:Euromed

File permission problem with File:MaikelBlays1.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:MaikelBlays1.jpg, which you've sourced to facebook.com. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:52, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Maïkel Blays

Hello, Euromed. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Maïkel Blays, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Maïkel Blays to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, GAtechnical (talk) 22:44, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:MaikelBlays2.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:MaikelBlays2.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LGA _talk^edits 09:13, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 09:15, 20 February 2013 (UTC) ok, I did nt know that, Thank you for the info[reply]

blanking of two redirects

Hello, I'm Rybec. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Maïkel Blays without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! likewise for Michael Blays Euromed was the author of these, so I probably shouldn't have given this warning.—rybec 09:15, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello I am the manager of Maikel Blays. This is an artist who had participated in the first season of the TV casting show "the Voice" (2011/2012). But now, he is signed with a record Label (Odacity Records). He alreay had 1 single in published in autoprotection last september, and now his album with the label odacity records is due to be released in march , and a single in 2 weeks; He already had severzl concerst, and participation as guest in Tv shows and radio . There is no reason to continue linking his name to "The VOice", with which he has no relation since more then a year; Thank you for not redirecting his name to The Voice page on wikipedia Matt --Euromed (talk) 09:50, 20 February 2013 (UTC) .[reply]

I've asked to have Maïkel Blays, Maikel Blays and Michael Blays deleted. If you'd like to have the article brought back so you can work on it, you can ask an administrator to "userfy" it. If you're going to use File:MaikelBlays1.jpg you might want to follow the instructions there so it won't get deleted too. —rybec 10:30, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

notability of musicians

Hi again. Here's an article that has some tips for giving your article more weight: User:Michig/How_to_find_sources_for_popular_music_articles.

Here's the official policy: WP:MUSICBIO. —rybec 09:38, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you ! --Euromed (talk) 09:51, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

Hello, Euromed. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may need to consider our guidance on conflicts of interest.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:58, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]