User talk:EuroDirect

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

EuroDirect (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

62.232.14.82 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address has been recently used by "EuroDirect Direct Marketing". The reason given for EuroDirect Direct Marketing's block is: "user...".

Blocking administrator: not provided.

Decline reason: For disruptive sockpuppetry (see below) your request has been declined and this account has been indefinitely blocked -- Netsnipe ► 11:23, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:International Classifications.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:International Classifications.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:22, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

MICROVISION

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article MICROVISION, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:MICROVISION. If you remove the {{dated prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Fram 12:08, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GMAP Consulting

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article GMAP Consulting, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:GMAP Consulting. If you remove the {{dated prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Fram 12:11, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

CAMEO

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article CAMEO, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:CAMEO. If you remove the {{dated prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Fram 12:13, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RollCall

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article RollCall, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:RollCall. If you remove the {{dated prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Fram 12:17, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Data Exchange

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Data Exchange, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:Data Exchange. If you remove the {{dated prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Fram 12:19, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User:EuroDirect deleted

Your userpage has been deleted for violating our Wikipedia:User page policy. Wikipedia is not a webspace provider and "substantial content on your user page that is unrelated to Wikipedia" such as advertising is prohibited. -- Netsnipe ► 11:00, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

The use of multiple accounts to circumvent blocks and for the purpose of using their userpage to advertise and/or repost deleted articles is strictly prohibited per Wikipedia:Sock puppetry.

EuroDirect Direct Marketing (talk • contribs • page moves • block user • block log)
GMAP (talk • contribs • page moves • block user • block log)
Gmap (talk • contribs • page moves • block user • block log)
Skipton (talk • contribs • page moves • block user • block log)
Skipton_Information_Group (talk • contribs • page moves • block user • block log)

For the disruptive use of these accounts, you have been blocked indefinitely. There are established processes and procedures (such as Wikipedia:Deletion review) which should be followed instead of subverted. -- Netsnipe ► 11:23, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]