User talk:Eunikaml

Speedy deletion nomination of Entovation

Hello Eunikaml,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Entovation for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 11:20, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of Interest

Hello, Eunikaml. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the article Entovation, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your circle, your organization, its competitors, projects or products;
instead propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 11:49, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I stop loosing time with URSS like censure. I begun this topic because there is a common interest. Jimmy W. confirmed last year in Montpellier that he created Wikipedia is to share knowledge.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.184.186.87 (talk) 15:16, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to User:Lemongirl942, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Why would you do that? It's not your use page. Seems like a petty "revenge" for being warned about WP:COI to me. LjL (talk) 14:09, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]