User talk:Eugene22

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is possibly the most important Wikipedia policy.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced to multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring and sockpuppetry.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism, doing so will result your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Lastly, if you are editing an article about an individual or group of people, please adhere to Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons' policy.

The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Dave ^{♠♣♥♦1185♪♫™} 03:12, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on City Harvest Church. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Personally, I don't like to template other editor(s) unless they are really out of line... and you are really out of line this time with that obnoxious revert (twice!) while a discussion is underway. My advice for you is to knock it off before you get BLOCKED for 3RR, take heed. Dave ^{♠♣♥♦1185♪♫™} 03:08, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

27 April 2010: Note your second warning of 3RR by me, knock it off before I report you for sanction measures. Take heed. --Dave ^{♠♣♥♦1185♪♫™} 12:04, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Suntec controversy

Before you revert again, please see [1] and the relevant discussion on the Talk page [2] (specifically the last bit). Jpatokal (talk) 03:06, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pls do not delete without consultation. This is a warning! Ahnan (talk) 04:09, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I did not delete without consulation. I shifted the paragraph back to the Building section where it was supposed to be.

Eugene22 (talk) 11:16, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]