User talk:Etoiledeneige

This is Etoiledeneige's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Didier Gazagnadou (October 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CaptainEek was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The tone is overly promotional. Also, attribution needs to be provided on the talk page that this article was created from a translation.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Didier Gazagnadou and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Didier Gazagnadou, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Captain Eek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 19:57, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Etoiledeneige! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Captain Eek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 19:57, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Etoiledeneige! You created a thread called translation : "attribution needs to be provided on the talk page" at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:06, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Small style matter

Hi again. I noticed on your draft article that you placed the references before punctuation marks, which is the style on French Wikipedia. On the English Wikipedia, it's the opposite (MOS:REFPUNCT). Thanks!

Bonjour encore. Je remarquai dans votre brouillon d'article que vous avez placé les références avant les signes de ponctuation, ce qui correspond au style utilisé sur la Wikipédia française. Sur la Wikipédia anglaise, c'est l'inverse (MOS:REFPUNCT). Merci! --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 19:30, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Didier Gazagnadou (December 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chris troutman was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Subject fails WP:NPROF. That he wrote stuff doesn't matter. That he was cited a couple times doesn't matter. I'm not convinced his memberships matter. Instead, wait until he dies and the obituaries afterward would be enough.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Didier Gazagnadou and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Didier Gazagnadou, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chris Troutman (talk) 22:07, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An answer to Chris Troutman

Dear Chris Troutman, I read carefully what you suggested to improve the page I wrote about D. Gazagnadou: Draft:Didier Gazagnadou and I would like to thank you.

I have added Authority control and I think it is clear that this full professor has proposed interesting thoughts on technical and cultural diffusion in Eurasia, following the steps of several famous authors, such as André Leroi-Gourhan, André-Georges Haudricourt, Joseph Needham, etc. and being cited in Nature (journal).

Actually D. Gazagnadou belongs to famous professors from University of Vincennes in Saint-Denis where Gilles Deleuze, Jacques Lacan, Bernard Maris, Helene Cixous and many others still teach or taught.

Etoiledeneige (talk) 02:43, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Didier Gazagnadou (February 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Didier Gazagnadou and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Didier Gazagnadou, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 02:51, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Didier Gazagnadou

Hello, Etoiledeneige. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Didier Gazagnadou".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 06:04, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]