User talk:EthanMars

July 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Jack Barakat, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will be removed shortly (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 06:56, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Simple Plan, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please do not cite simpleplan.cz as it is a fansite and unreliable. Binksternet (talk) 05:45, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Perfect (Simple Plan song), you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 05:55, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Bring Me the Horizon.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Bring Me the Horizon was changed by EthanMars (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.85901 on 2016-07-19T06:12:04+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:12, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Oliver Sykes

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Oliver Sykes, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 10:30, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. DMacks (talk) 04:39, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please please actually read WP:RS very carefully. You know where your behavior here on wikipedia led last time; you'll likely be indenfinitely blocked if it continues. DMacks (talk) 19:51, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GA nomination

Please read WP:GAI for instructions on how to nominate an article for good article status. That page is controlled by a bot and editing it directly will do nothing. Adding it there will just result in it being removed whenever the bot goes through next. You also might want to take a look at the criteria at WP:GA?. --Majora (talk) 03:22, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Bring Me the Horizon into Oliver Sykes. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 20:53, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Frank Iero. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Do not add info from fansites. These are unreliable sources. Please stop adding this alongside original research. Sekyaw (talk) 17:42, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making disruptive edits.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Sekyaw (talk) 17:50, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of A Line of Horizon in Chemicals

The article A Line of Horizon in Chemicals has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is a fake band, apparently created by assembling content from My Chemical Romance, Bring Me the Horizon, Three Days Grace, etc.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Animalparty! (talk) 20:30, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:A Line of Horizon in Chemicals

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Template:A Line of Horizon in Chemicals, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --Animalparty! (talk) 20:35, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Origami Apparatus

The article Origami Apparatus has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Apparent hoax article: no sources, no credible evidence found of this band's existence.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Animalparty! (talk) 20:53, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

Please do not create, maintain or restore hoaxes on Wikipedia. Hoaxes are eligible for speedy deletion under criterion G3. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia — and then to correct them if possible. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you. --Animalparty! (talk) 20:55, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pencey Prep (Metal band)

The article Pencey Prep (Metal band) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Apparent hoax/ fictional band: no credible evidence for British band's existence, as opposed to Pencey Prep (Rock band).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Animalparty! (talk) 20:57, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. DMacks (talk) 21:03, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]