User talk:EthanFio

This user is a student editor in California_State_University_Sacramento/ENVS_10H_(Spring_2019) .

Welcome!

Hello, EthanFio, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Choosing an article to edit Editing an article • Add images to articles Citing sources on Wikipedia
Additional Resources
You can find answers to many student questions on our Q&A site, ask.wikiedu.org

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 20:41, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lead Section:

   The definition of coniology is simple, clear, and concise. However, the significance of coniology should be added, why should people care about this topic? Some supplemental information with even coverage about which categories the article discusses might also help.

Structure:

   The structure is overall good. The three subheadings of Earth, Moon, and Other Celestial Bodies are distinct enough to each warrant their own section and seem to be in good order. A suggestion is to check if any topics within these subheadings are distinct enough to warrant their own smaller subheadings.

Balance coverage:

   So far, the article still needs to be worked on so I can't speak for the coverage yet. Although, considering the existing bullet points, the Moon section could use some more attention, unless if this section is less significant than the other two and has less literature written on it.

Neutrality:

   The writer of the article has yet to write a significant amount of his own words to determine whether the article is neutral or not.

Reliability:

   The article has a high reliability because all of the written sources come from .gov websites that have reputations for reliable space research.

AlanNavai (talk) 23:13, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Instructor Feedback

You've added a lot of content to Coniology, nice work! Here are some suggestions to make sure you get a good grade:

You're still a bit light on content, are there any other topics you could cover? Dust on other planets in our solar system maybe?
One more pass at linking to other wikipedia pages is needed, e.g. for Earth
Check for spelling and grammar throughout

--Julianfulton (talk) 18:52, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]